CVE-2024-26255
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn information disclosure vulnerability exists in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (RASCMAN). The vulnerability allows a local attacker to potentially access sensitive information through the Remote Access Connection Manager service. The CVSS 5.5 score indicates moderate severity with low attack complexity and local attack vector.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.5696< 10.0.19044.4291< 10.0.19045.4291< 10.0.22000.2899< 10.0.22621.3447< 10.0.22631.3447< 10.0.17763.5696< 10.0.20348.2402CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to display the Windows version and build numberAffected if The build number is lower than the version thresholds: 17763.5696 for Windows 10 1809/Server 2019, 19044.4291 for Windows 10 21h2, 19045.4291 for Windows 10 22h2, 22000.2899 for Windows 11 21h2, 22621.3447 for Windows 11 22h2, 22631.3447 for Windows 11 23h2, or 20348.2402 for Windows Server 2022
-
Verify RASCMAN service presenceOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'Get-Service -Name RasMan' or 'sc query RasMan' to check if the Remote Access Connection Manager service exists on the systemAffected if The RASCMAN service is present and running on a Windows version with a build number below the thresholds listed above
-
Confirm exact OS build via PowerShellRun 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsName, OsVersion, OsBuildNumber' in PowerShell to retrieve the precise OS name and build numberAffected if The OsBuildNumber value is less than the corresponding threshold for your specific Windows version
A system is affected if it runs any of the listed Windows versions with a build number below the specified threshold and has the RASCMAN service present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.569610.0.19044.429110.0.19045.4291
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2024-26255 through Windows Update or manual patch deployment to affected Windows systems running Remote Access Connection Manager.
Windows 10 1809/Server 2019: 10.0.17763.5696 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.4291 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.4291 | Windows 11 21h2: 10.0.22000.2899 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.3447 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.3447 | Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.2402
- Identify current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- For Windows 10 1809 and Windows Server 2019: Upgrade to version 10.0.17763.5696 or later
- For Windows 10 21h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.19044.4291 or later
- For Windows 10 22h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.19045.4291 or later
- For Windows 11 21h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.22000.2899 or later
- For Windows 11 22h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.22621.3447 or later
- For Windows 11 23h2: Upgrade to version 10.0.22631.3447 or later
- For Windows Server 2022: Upgrade to version 10.0.20348.2402 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26255 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26255 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data