CVE-2024-26260
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe functionality for synchronization in HGiga OAKlouds' certain moudules has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing remote attackers to inject system commands within specific request parameters. This enables the execution of arbitrary code on the remote server without permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHGiga OAKlouds contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability in the synchronization functionality of certain modules. Remote attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands through specific request parameters without authentication, achieving complete remote code execution on the affected server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 188< 188< 1051< 1051CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed product typeCheck system information or web application banners to determine if HGiga Oaklouds Organization or Webbase is installed. Look for product identifiers in the web interface, help/about pages, or installation directories.Affected if Product is Hgiga Oaklouds Organization or Webbase (either 2.x or 3.x branch)
-
Determine installed version numberAccess the administrative interface or check version files in the installation directory. The version is typically displayed in the system info panel, a /version endpoint, or a config/version file within the application root.Affected if Version cannot be determined or is older than published patch levels
-
Compare version against affected rangesFor Organization 2.0 or 3.0: verify if version is less than 188. For Webbase 2.0 or 3.0: verify if version is less than 1051. Cross-reference with vendor release notes if available.Affected if Organization version < 188 OR Webbase version < 1051
-
Locate synchronization module configurationExamine the application configuration files or web.xml to identify if the synchronization functionality module is enabled and accessible. Look for endpoints related to sync, synchronization, or data replication.Affected if Synchronization module is present and accessible (the vulnerability exists in this module)
-
Review access logs for suspicious sync requestsInspect web server access logs (IIS, Apache, or built-in logs) for POST requests to synchronization-related endpoints containing shell metacharacters (|, ;, &, $`, etc.) or unusual command patterns.Affected if Unusual or malicious requests found in logs targeting sync functionality
A system is affected if it runs Hgiga Oaklouds Organization version < 188 or Webbase version < 1051, and the synchronization module is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1881051
Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters in affected synchronization modules, preferably by avoiding shell command execution altogether and using parameterized APIs instead; restrict network access to vulnerable systems until patches are applied.
Oaklouds Organization >= 188 | Oaklouds Webbase >= 1051
- Identify the currently installed Oaklouds product (Organization or Webbase) and its exact version
- Determine whether you are running version 2.0 or 3.0 of the product
- For Oaklouds Organization: upgrade to version 188 or later
- For Oaklouds Webbase: upgrade to version 1051 or later
- After upgrading, verify the synchronization functionality works correctly
- Monitor system logs for any unusual command execution attempts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26260 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26260 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data