RiswebApplication · Ebmtech

CVE-2024-26263

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-02-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
EBM Technologies RISWEB's specific URL path is not properly controlled by permission, allowing attackers to browse specific pages and query sensitive data without login.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

EBM Technologies RISWEB has improper authorization controls on specific URL paths, allowing unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication and access sensitive pages or query data without login credentials. This is a Broken Access Control / Insecure Direct Object Reference vulnerability in the web application's permission enforcement mechanism.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and session validation on all URL paths, enforce authorization checks before rendering sensitive pages or returning data, and validate user permissions for every protected resource request.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RiswebApplication
Affected:>= 1.0, < 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm RISWEB version
    Locate the installed RISWEB version through the application's about page, admin panel, or version file in the installation directory. Compare this version against the affected range: >= 1.0 and < 3.0.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0 through 2.x
  2. Identify authentication-protected endpoints
    Review application documentation or enumerate common sensitive paths such as administrative interfaces, patient data views, or reporting modules that should require login.
    Affected if The application exposes sensitive endpoints that should require authentication
  3. Test for authorization bypass
    Attempt to access identified sensitive endpoints directly without providing any login credentials, using a browser or HTTP client.
    Affected if Sensitive pages load or data is returned without any authentication being required
  4. Check authentication enforcement configuration
    Inspect the web server or application configuration files that define access control rules and permission mappings for URL paths.
    Affected if Authentication is not enforced on sensitive URL paths

User is affected if RISWEB version is >= 1.0 and < 3.0 AND sensitive endpoints can be accessed without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.0 or later
Fixed in 3.0
Interim mitigation

Implement proper authentication and session validation on all URL paths, enforce authorization checks before rendering sensitive pages or returning data, and validate user permissions for every protected resource request.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

RISWEB version 3.0 or later

  1. Contact EBM Technologies to obtain the upgraded RISWEB version 3.0 or later
  2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
  3. Backup the current RISWEB configuration and database before upgrading
  4. Upgrade RISWEB to version 3.0 or latest stable release
  5. Verify that the permission controls are properly applied to all URL paths
  6. Test that authentication is now required for accessing sensitive pages and data
  7. Confirm the vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Caveat Unknown - contact vendor for upgrade documentation and potential migration requirements

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Risweb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26263 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data