CVE-2024-26267
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Liferay Portal 7.2.0 through 7.4.3.25, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 7.4 before update 26, 7.3 before update 5, 7.2 before fix pack 19, and older unsupported versions the default value of the portal property `http.header.version.verbosity` is set to `full`, which allows remote attackers to easily identify the version of the application that is running and the vulnerabilities that affect that version via 'Liferay-Portal` response header.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Limerick Portal 7.2.0-7.4.3.25 and Limerick DXP (7.4 < update 26, 7.3 < update 5, 7.2 < fix pack 19), the portal property `http.header.version.verbosity` defaults to 'full', causing the `Lifera-Portal` HTTP response header to expose the exact version number. This version information allows remote attackers to fingerprint the application and identify known vulnerabilities affecting that specific version.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.3.7>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.26< 7.2= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check for version-exposing HTTP response headerSend an HTTP request to the portal (e.g., curl -I https://yourportal.example.com) and inspect the response headers for a header named 'Lifera-Portal'Affected if The 'Lifera-Portal' header is present and contains a full version number (such as 7.4.3.25 or similar)
-
Verify the http.header.version.verbosity property settingInspect the portal-ext.properties or portal-setup-wizard.properties file (typically in the Liferay home directory or application server config) and look for the property 'http.header.version.verbosity'Affected if The property is set to 'full' or is absent (defaults to 'full'), meaning version information is fully exposed
-
Determine the installed Liferay Portal versionCheck the portal's version by inspecting the manifest file, the Liferay Dashboard (if accessible), or the 'Lifera-Portal' header value itselfAffected if The installed version falls within <= 7.3.7, >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.3.26, or is any version of Liferay DXP (7.2, 7.3, or 7.4) prior to their respective updates
You are affected if the 'Lifera-Portal' header reveals the full version number and your installation matches the affected version ranges, with the property set to 'full' or left at default.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.27.4.3.26
Set the portal property `http.header.version.verbosity` to a less verbose value (such as 'partial' or 'none') in the portal-ext.properties or portal-setup-wizard.properties file, then restart the application server.
Liferay Portal 7.4.3.26 / DXP 7.4 Update 26 / DXP 7.3 Update 5 / DXP 7.2 Fix Pack 19
- 1. Identify the exact Liferay product and version currently running (Portal or DXP, and version number)
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.26 or later
- 3. For Liferay DXP 7.4: Apply Update 26 or later
- 4. For Liferay DXP 7.3: Apply Update 5 or later
- 5. For Liferay DXP 7.2: Apply Fix Pack 19 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the fix by making a request and confirming the 'Liferay-Portal' header no longer exposes full version information
- 7. Alternatively or additionally, set the portal property 'http.header.version.verbosity' to 'minimal' or 'none' in portal-ext.properties or portal-setup-wizard.properties
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-26267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-26267 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data