CVE-2024-2658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA misconfiguration in lmadmin.exe of FlexNet Publisher versions prior to 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0) allows the OpenSSL configuration file to load from a non-existent directory. An unauthorized, locally authenticated user with low privileges can potentially create the directory and load a specially crafted openssl.conf file leading to the execution of a malicious DLL (Dynamic-Link Library) with elevated privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe lmadmin.exe component in FlexNet Publisher versions prior to 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0) attempts to load an OpenSSL configuration file from a directory that may not exist on the system. A low-privilege authenticated user can create this directory and place a malicious openssl.conf file that triggers loading of a specially crafted DLL, which executes with elevated privileges due to how lmadmin.exe runs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate lmadmin.exe on the systemSearch for lmadmin.exe in typical FlexNet installation paths such as C:\Program Files\FlexNet\, C:\Program Files (x86)\FlexNet\, or use 'where /r C:\ lmadmin.exe' from an elevated command promptAffected if lmadmin.exe is found on the system, proceed to version check
-
Determine the installed FlexNet Publisher versionRight-click lmadmin.exe, select Properties, then view the Details tab for Product Version. Alternatively, run 'lmadmin -version' from the installation directory if supported, or check the Add/Remove Programs entry for FlexNet PublisherAffected if Version is present and is lower than 11.19.6.0, the system may be vulnerable
-
Identify directories searched for openssl.confMonitor lmadmin.exe execution with Process Monitor (ProcMon) from Sysinternals, filtering by path containing 'openssl.conf' or 'openssl.cnf' to observe which directories the process attempts to accessAffected if lmadmin.exe attempts to load openssl.conf from a user-writable location
-
Check permissions on the searched directory pathUse icacls or File Explorer security tab to examine write permissions on the directory identified in step 3. Check if Authenticated Users or low-privilege users have Modify or Write permissionsAffected if Low-privilege authenticated users can create subdirectories or files in the path lmadmin.exe searches for openssl.conf
The system is affected if FlexNet Publisher version is below 11.19.6.0 AND a directory in lmadmin.exe's search path for openssl.conf is writable by low-privilege users, allowing DLL preloading with elevated execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to FlexNet Publisher 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0) or later to remediate the directory misconfiguration. Alternatively, ensure strict filesystem permissions on license server directories to prevent low-privilege users from creating directories in locations where lmadmin.exe searches for configuration files.
FlexNet Publisher 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0)
- Identify all servers/workstations running FlexNet Publisher lmadmin.exe
- Check current version of FlexNet Publisher (lmadmin.exe) to confirm it is prior to 11.19.6.0
- Obtain the fixed version FlexNet Publisher 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0) from the official Flexera download portal or your existing license fulfillment
- Backup the current FlexNet Publisher installation and configuration files
- Apply the upgrade by running the installer for version 2024 R1 (11.19.6.0)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the lmadmin.exe version shows 11.19.6.0 or later
- Confirm the OpenSSL configuration now loads from the correct directory and not a user-controlled path
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data