CVE-2024-27181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Apache Linkis <= 1.5.0, Privilege Escalation in Basic management services where the attacking user is a trusted account allows access to Linkis's Token information. Users are advised to upgrade to version 1.6.0, which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApache Linkis versions 1.5.0 and earlier contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Basic management services component. An attacker with a trusted account can escalate privileges to gain unauthorized access to Linkis's Token information, which could lead to further authentication bypass or data exposure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Linkis installed versionCheck the Linkis installation directory for version information. Common locations: check VERSION file in installation root, or query the Linkis management console for the version metadata. Run: ls -la <linkis_install_dir>/VERSION or look in the About section of the Linkis web console.Affected if Installed version is 1.5.0 or earlier (any version < 1.6.0)
-
Confirm Token management module is enabledVerify that the Token management service/endpoint is enabled in Linkis configuration. Check configuration files (linkis.properties or similar) for token-related settings such as wds.linkis.token.enable or token.service.enabled. Also verify the token management REST API endpoints are accessible.Affected if Token management module is active and accessible via REST API or web interface
-
Review token management endpoint access controlsExamine the access control configuration for token management endpoints. Check if the endpoints allow authenticated users with lower privileges to access token information. Look for any configuration that controls who can call /api/linkisManager/token/* or similar token management routes.Affected if Token endpoints do not enforce proper privilege escalation checks, allowing lower-privilege authenticated users to retrieve token credentials
-
Audit existing trusted accountsList all accounts marked as 'trusted' in the Linkis user database or configuration. Query the underlying database for users with trust relationship flags or check linkis-mg.properties for trusted.user.list settings.Affected if Multiple trusted accounts exist, particularly any with reduced privilege levels compared to admin accounts
You are affected if your Apache Linkis installation is version 1.5.0 or earlier, the token management module is enabled, and lower-privilege trusted users can access token credential endpoints without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.6.0
Upgrade to Apache Linkis version 1.6.0 or later. Before upgrading, inventory all trusted accounts and review token access controls as part of the migration.
Apache Linkis 1.6.0
- 1. Back up the current Apache Linkis installation, including configuration files and databases
- 2. Stop the Linkis service to prevent any active connections during upgrade
- 3. Download Apache Linkis version 1.6.0 from the official Apache distribution mirrors (https://dl.apache.org/linkis/)
- 4. Install version 1.6.0 following the standard upgrade documentation for your deployment method (manual, Docker, Kubernetes, etc.)
- 5. Restore any custom configurations from the backup, ensuring compatibility with version 1.6.0
- 6. Start the Linkis service and verify it runs without errors
- 7. Validate that the privilege escalation vulnerability is resolved by testing token access with non-admin trusted accounts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data