CVE-2024-27387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Samsung Mobile Processor Exynos 980, Exynos 850, Exynos 1280, Exynos 1380, and Exynos 1330. In the function slsi_rx_range_done_ind(), there is no input validation check on rtt_id coming from userspace, which can lead to a heap overwrite.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap overflow vulnerability exists in the slsi_rx_range_done_ind() function in Samsung Exynos mobile processors (980, 850, 1280, 1380, 1330). The rtt_id parameter received from userspace is not validated before use, allowing a malicious userspace application to overwrite heap memory by providing a crafted rtt_id value.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos processor model in your deviceCheck the device specifications or use system information tools (e.g., 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android, or check the device model/board documentation). Look for Exynos chip identifiers such as 980, 850, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1080, 1480, or W920.Affected if The device contains any of the following Exynos chips: 980, 850, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1080, 1480, or W920.
-
Determine the firmware version of the Exynos chipAccess the baseband/modem firmware information through device settings (Settings > About Phone > Software Information > Baseband version) or via diagnostic tools provided by the device manufacturer.Affected if The firmware version cannot be verified as patched, since all versions of the affected Exynos firmwares are vulnerable.
-
Check if Wi-Fi RTT (IEEE 802.11mc) feature is enabledOn Android devices, go to Settings > Network & Internet > Wi-Fi > Wi-Fi RTT (or look for 'RTT' or 'Fine Timing Measurement' in Wi-Fi settings). Also check if any applications have requested RTT location permissions.Affected if Wi-Fi RTT functionality is enabled on the device, as this triggers the vulnerable slsi_rx_range_done_ind() code path.
-
Review application permissions for Wi-Fi RTT accessCheck which applications have location permissions that include Wi-Fi RTT capability by examining app permissions in Settings > Apps > Permissions > Location, looking for apps with RTT or 'Fine location' permissions.Affected if Any application has been granted Wi-Fi RTT/location permissions, providing a potential attack vector to trigger the vulnerable function.
A defender is affected if their environment contains a Samsung device with an Exynos 980, 850, 1280, 1380, 1330, 1080, 1480, or W920 processor, and Wi-Fi RTT feature is enabled or accessible to applications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Samsung firmware/security updates for affected devices once released. Until then, limit exposure by restricting which applications can access relevant hardware interfaces and monitor for anomalous behavior.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data