Easergy StudioApplication · Schneider Electric

CVE-2024-2747

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.3.3 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
CWE-428: Unquoted search path or element vulnerability exists in Easergy Studio, which could cause privilege escalation when a valid user replaces a trusted file name on the system and reboots the machine.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Easergy Studio contains a CWE-428 unquoted service path vulnerability that allows a local authenticated user to achieve privilege escalation by placing a malicious executable in an unquoted path location and triggering execution upon system reboot.

MitigationRestrict write permissions on directories in the service path to prevent unauthorized file replacement, and verify all service paths use quoted strings in service configurations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Easergy StudioApplication
Affected:<= 9.3.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Easergy Studio installation
    Check for Schneider Electric Easergy Studio in Windows installed programs (Add/Remove Programs) or look in C:\Program Files\Schneider Electric\Easergy Studio for the application directory
    Affected if Easergy Studio is not present on the system, the vulnerability does not apply
  2. Identify installed version
    Check the version of Easergy Studio by right-clicking the executable in the installation directory and selecting Properties, or check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for the version entry
    Affected if Version is 9.3.3 or lower (any version up to and including 9.3.3)
  3. Enumerate Easergy Studio Windows services
    Open Command Prompt or PowerShell and run: sc query type= service state= all | findstr /i "Easergy" or Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.DisplayName -like "*Easergy*"}
    Affected if No services with 'Easergy' in the name are found, the vulnerability does not apply
  4. Inspect service binary paths for unquoted paths
    For each Easergy service found, run: sc qc <ServiceName> (or check Registry at HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\<ServiceName> for the ImagePath value). Examine the binary path for spaces that are NOT enclosed in quotes
    Affected if The service binary path contains spaces without surrounding quotes (e.g., C:\Program Files\Schneider Electric\Easergy Studio\service.exe instead of "C:\Program Files\Schneider Electric\Easergy Studio\service.exe")
  5. Verify service is configured to start
    Run: sc qc <ServiceName> and check the START_TYPE field, or run Get-Service -Name <ServiceName> | Select-Object Status,StartType
    Affected if Service is set to auto-start (START_TYPE: AUTO_START) or manual start, meaning it could execute upon system reboot with the unquoted path vulnerability

You are affected if Easergy Studio version 9.3.3 or lower is installed AND one or more of its Windows services have unquoted binary paths containing spaces.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.3.3
Interim mitigation

Restrict write permissions on directories in the service path to prevent unauthorized file replacement, and verify all service paths use quoted strings in service configurations.

Fix this in Easergy Studio Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2747 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2747 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data