EskoolyApplication

CVE-2024-27715

HIGH · 8.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.0 or later.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Eskooly Free Online School management Software v.3.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via a crafted request to the Password Change mechanism.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Eskooly Free Online School Management Software versions 3.0 and earlier contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the password change functionality. A remote attacker can submit crafted requests to the password change mechanism to elevate their account privileges, likely due to missing or improper authorization validation when changing passwords for other users.

MitigationImplement role-based access control (RBAC) checks to verify the requesting user has permission to modify the target user's password, and validate that users can only change their own passwords unless explicitly authorized.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EskoolyApplication
Affected:<= 3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Eskooly version
    Locate the application version in the software documentation, admin panel, or footer/branding area. Check the source code if accessible for a version identifier or release notes file.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.0 or earlier.
  2. Locate the password change functionality
    Access the user account or profile settings area of the web application. Identify the endpoint or form used for password changes (typically found in user profile, settings, or account management sections).
    Affected if The password change feature exists and is accessible to users.
  3. Verify authorization controls on password change
    Attempt to change the password of a different user account (e.g., using a low-privilege user account to change another user's password). Observe whether the application rejects the request or allows the change without proper admin authorization.
    Affected if Users can modify other users' passwords without proper authorization validation, indicating the privilege escalation flaw exists.
  4. Check for role-based access enforcement
    Examine the password change request handling code or network requests. Determine whether the application validates that the requesting user has permission to change the target user's password, or if it allows any authenticated user to change any account's password.
    Affected if The application lacks role-based checks and permits unauthorized password modifications.

A user is affected if they are running Eskooly version 3.0 or earlier AND the password change functionality allows users to modify other users' passwords without proper authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.0
Interim mitigation

Implement role-based access control (RBAC) checks to verify the requesting user has permission to modify the target user's password, and validate that users can only change their own passwords unless explicitly authorized.

Fix this in Eskooly Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27715 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27715 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data