CVE-2024-27796
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.7.8 and iPadOS 16.7.8, iOS 17.5 and iPadOS 17.5, macOS Monterey 12.7.5, macOS Sonoma 14.5, macOS Ventura 13.6.7. An attacker may be able to elevate privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in Apple's operating systems. The fix with 'improved checks' indicates a missing validation or authorization check that allowed a local attacker to elevate privileges. The vulnerability affects multiple Apple platforms including iOS, iPadOS, and macOS across several version ranges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 16.7.8>= 17.0, < 17.5< 16.7.8>= 17.0, < 17.5>= 12.0, < 12.7.5>= 13.0, < 13.6.7>= 14.0, < 14.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the operating system typeOn iOS/iPadOS, go to Settings > General > About. On macOS, click the Apple menu and select About This Mac or run `sw_vers` in Terminal.Affected if The device runs iOS, iPadOS, or macOS within the affected version ranges below.
-
Check iOS or iPadOS versionOn the device, go to Settings > General > About > Version. Note the exact version number shown.Affected if The version is less than 16.7.8, OR greater than or equal to 17.0 but less than 17.5.
-
Check macOS versionClick Apple menu > About This Mac, or run `sw_vers` in Terminal. Note the version shown (for example, 12.7.4, 13.6.6, or 14.4).Affected if The version is 12.0 to 12.7.4 (less than 12.7.5), OR 13.0 to 13.6.6 (less than 13.6.7), OR 14.0 to 14.4 (less than 14.5).
-
Confirm affected statusCross-reference your identified OS type and version against the affected ranges: iOS/iPadOS < 16.7.8 or >= 17.0 to < 17.5; macOS 12.0 to < 12.7.5, 13.0 to < 13.6.7, or 14.0 to < 14.5.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges, meaning the missing validation fix is not present and the system is potentially vulnerable to local privilege escalation.
If the device runs iOS or iPadOS below 16.7.8 or between 17.0 and 17.4, or macOS between 12.0 and 12.7.4, 13.0 and 13.6.6, or 14.0 and 14.4, then the environment is affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.7.513.6.714.5
Apply the available security updates: iOS 16.7.8 and iOS 17.5+, iPadOS 16.7.8 and iPadOS 17.5+, macOS Monterey 12.7.5, macOS Ventura 13.6.7, and macOS Sonoma 14.5. Prioritize updating devices that handle sensitive data or have direct user access.
iOS 16.7.8, iOS 17.5, iPadOS 16.7.8, iPadOS 17.5, macOS 12.7.5, macOS 13.6.7, or macOS 14.5 (depending on current OS version)
- Identify the current iOS/iPadOS version on the device by going to Settings > General > About
- For devices running iOS 16.x: Update to iOS 16.7.8 or later via Settings > General > Software Update
- For devices running iOS 17.x: Update to iOS 17.5 or later via Settings > General > Software Update
- For iPad devices running iPadOS 16.x: Update to iPadOS 16.7.8 or later via Settings > General > Software Update
- For iPad devices running iPadOS 17.x: Update to iPadOS 17.5 or later via Settings > General > Software Update
- On Mac devices, check the macOS version via Apple menu > About This Mac
- For macOS Monterey (12.x): Update to macOS 12.7.5 via System Settings > Software Update
- For macOS Ventura (13.x): Update to macOS 13.6.7 via System Settings > Software Update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27796 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27796 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data