CVE-2024-27905
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited** UNSUPPORTED WHEN ASSIGNED ** Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Aurora. An endpoint exposing internals to unauthenticated users can be used as a "padding oracle" allowing an anonymous attacker to construct a valid authentication cookie. Potentially this could be combined with vulnerabilities in other components to achieve remote code execution. As this project is retired, we do not plan to release a version that fixes this issue. Users are recommended to find an alternative or restrict access to the instance to trusted users. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Aurora contains a padding oracle vulnerability where an unauthenticated endpoint exposes internal information, allowing attackers to decrypt or construct valid authentication cookies. This can enable full authentication bypass and potentially lead to remote code execution when chained with other vulnerabilities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 0.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Apache Aurora is installedSearch for Aurora installation directories, process lists, or service configurations (e.g., ps aux | grep -i aurora, find /opt -name '*aurora*', check systemd services)Affected if Apache Aurora is found running in the environment
-
Determine installed Aurora versionCheck the version file in the Aurora installation directory or run 'aurora version' if available; compare against the affected range >= 0.5.0Affected if The installed version is 0.5.0 or higher
-
Verify network exposure of unauthenticated endpointsReview firewall rules, network ACLs, or proxy configurations to determine if Aurora management ports (typically 8081, 8082) are reachable from untrusted network segments or the public internetAffected if Aurora management interfaces are accessible from untrusted networks without authentication controls
-
Confirm unauthenticated endpoint behaviorAttempt a request to the root or /health endpoint of the Aurora service from an unauthorized network location to verify it responds without authenticationAffected if The service responds to unauthenticated requests, indicating the padding oracle endpoint is exposed
A user is affected if Apache Aurora version 0.5.0 or higher is running and its unauthenticated endpoints are accessible from untrusted network locations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince the project is retired with no fix planned, organizations should either migrate to an alternative solution or implement strict network-level access controls to limit exposure to trusted users only.
- Restrict network access to the Apache Aurora instance to trusted users only, such as by using firewall rules or network segmentation
- If the Aurora instance is exposed to the internet, block external access entirely or place it behind a VPN with strong authentication
- If possible, disable or remove the vulnerable endpoint that exposes internals to unauthenticated users
- Review and limit cookie/credential handling to prevent padding oracle attacks
- Monitor access logs for suspicious authentication patterns
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27905 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27905 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data