Ruggedcom CrossbowApplication · Siemens

CVE-2024-27940

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.5 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V5.5). The affected systems allow any authenticated user to send arbitrary SQL commands to the SQL server. An attacker could use this vulnerability to compromise the whole database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW versions prior to V5.5 contain an SQL injection vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send arbitrary SQL commands directly to the backend SQL server, enabling full database compromise.

MitigationUpgrade RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW to version V5.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ruggedcom CrossbowApplication
Affected:< 5.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW installation
    Locate the RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW installation directory or check system inventory for the presence of this Siemens product. Look for the crossbow executable, service, or installation folder.
    Affected if RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW is not present on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Access the product interface or check version information via the application's about section, CLI command, or installation metadata. Compare the version number against V5.5.
    Affected if Installed version is earlier than V5.5 (e.g., V5.4, V5.3, etc.)
  3. Verify SQL database configuration
    Check if the product is configured to use a backend SQL database. Inspect the database connection settings in the product configuration files or management interface.
    Affected if A SQL database is connected and configured as the backend
  4. Confirm authenticated access exists
    Determine whether user accounts are configured and accessible in the RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW system. Check for local users, LDAP integration, or other authentication methods.
    Affected if Any valid user credentials exist that can log into the CROSSBOW interface

A system is affected if RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW is installed with a version prior to V5.5, has a SQL database backend configured, and has at least one authenticated user account.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.5 or later
Fixed in 5.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW to version V5.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

V5.5

  1. Obtain the Ruggedcom Crossbow V5.5 update from Siemens cert-portal.siemens.com or through official Siemens support channels
  2. Review all upgrade prerequisites and backup procedures documented by Siemens for Ruggedcom Crossbow
  3. Follow Siemens documented upgrade procedure to apply the V5.5 update to the affected system
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the software version and testing core functionality
  5. Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer present by validating that arbitrary SQL commands are not executable

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ruggedcom Crossbow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27940 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27940 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data