Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2024-27974

MEDIUM · 6.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in FUJIFILM printers which implement CentreWare Internet Services or Internet Services allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to alter user information. In the case the user is an administrator, the settings such as the administrator's ID, password, etc. may be altered. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendor listed under [References].

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FUJIFILM printers running CentreWare Internet Services allows remote unauthenticated attackers to submit unauthorized requests that modify user credentials and administrator settings without the victim's knowledge or consent.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied firmware patches when available; as an interim control, restrict network access to printer management interfaces and disable remote administration features when not in use.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the printer model
    Access the printer's web interface or check the physical device label for the model number. Confirm it is a FUJIFILM printer that uses CentreWare Internet Services (CWIS) as its web management interface.
    Affected if The device is a FUJIFILM printer running CentreWare Internet Services (CWIS)
  2. Verify CentreWare Internet Services is accessible
    Attempt to access the printer's web interface via HTTP/HTTPS using the printer's IP address (e.g., http://<printer-ip>). Confirm the CentreWare Internet Services login page loads.
    Affected if The CWIS web interface is reachable on the network
  3. Confirm remote administration is enabled
    Log into CentreWare Internet Services as administrator. Navigate to the Connectivity or Network Settings section. Check if remote/web-based administration is enabled (this is typically enabled by default).
    Affected if Remote administration via CWIS is turned on (the default configuration)
  4. Review user accounts and admin settings for unauthorized changes
    In CWIS, go to the Users or Accounts section. Compare the list of user accounts, passwords, and permission levels against known-good baselines. Check the Administrator Settings or Security settings for unexpected modifications.
    Affected if Unknown or unauthorized user accounts exist, or administrator settings have been changed without your knowledge

If you have a FUJIFILM printer with CentreWare Internet Services exposed and remote administration enabled, and you detect unauthorized account or settings changes, you may be affected by this CSRF vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied firmware patches when available; as an interim control, restrict network access to printer management interfaces and disable remote administration features when not in use.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-27974 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-27974 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data