CVE-2024-28015
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command vulnerability in NEC Corporation Aterm WG1800HP4, WG1200HS3, WG1900HP2, WG1200HP3, WG1800HP3, WG1200HS2, WG1900HP, WG1200HP2, W1200EX(-MS), WG1200HS, WG1200HP, WF300HP2, W300P, WF800HP, WR8165N, WG2200HP, WF1200HP2, WG1800HP2, WF1200HP, WG600HP, WG300HP, WF300HP, WG1800HP, WG1400HP, WR8175N, WR9300N, WR8750N, WR8160N, WR9500N, WR8600N, WR8370N, WR8170N, WR8700N, WR8300N, WR8150N, WR4100N, WR4500N, WR8100N, WR8500N, CR2500P, WR8400N, WR8200N, WR1200H, WR7870S, WR6670S, WR7850S, WR6650S, WR6600H, WR7800H, WM3400RN, WM3450RN, WM3500R, WM3600R, WM3800R, WR8166N, MR01LN MR02LN, WG1810HP(JE) and WG1810HP(MF) all versions allows a attacker to execute an arbitrary OS command with the root privilege via the internet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an OS command injection vulnerability in NEC Aterm wireless routers where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being passed to system shell commands. An unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands with root privileges by sending specially crafted requests to the affected devices over the internet.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router's web administration interface and check the device information or status page to confirm the exact model number (e.g., Wg1800hp4, Wg1200hs3, Wg1900hp2, Wg1200hp3, Wg1800hp3, Wr7850s, Wr6650s, Wr6600h). Alternatively, check the physical device label or documentation.Affected if The model matches any of the following: Wg1800hp4, Wg1200hs3, Wg1900hp2, Wg1200hp3, Wg1800hp3, Wr7850s, Wr6650s, or Wr6600h.
-
Confirm all firmware versions are affectedCheck the router's web administration interface for the installed firmware version. The CVE documentation states all firmware versions are affected for the listed models.Affected if Any firmware version is installed on one of the affected models.
-
Check if WAN-side remote management is enabledLog into the router's web administration interface and navigate to the remote management or WAN access settings. Look for options such as 'Remote Management', 'WAN Side Access', 'Remote Configuration', or 'Web GUI Access from WAN'. Verify whether these settings allow access from internet IP addresses.Affected if Remote management or WAN-side administrative access is enabled, allowing the router's web interface to be reached from the internet.
-
Determine if the router is internet-facingCheck the router's WAN IP address in the status or connection information page. Use an external scanner or check if the router's public IP is reachable from outside the local network on common management ports (80, 443, 8080).Affected if The router's administrative interface is reachable from the public internet on any port.
If the device is one of the affected NEC Aterm models and its remote management interface is accessible from the internet, the environment is vulnerable to unauthenticated command injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware updates when available. If no patch exists, immediately restrict remote management access by disabling WAN-facing administration interfaces and implement network segmentation to prevent internet exposure of affected devices.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,048.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28015 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28015 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data