OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2024-28749

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A remote attacker with high privileges may use a writing file function to inject OS commands.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a command injection vulnerability in a file writing function. A remote attacker with high privileges can exploit the lack of input sanitization in the file writing mechanism to inject and execute arbitrary OS commands on the underlying system.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all file writing operations, preferably using allowlist validation for file names and paths. Apply the principle of least privilege to limit what commands the application process can execute.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the application and its installed version
    Run the application's version command (e.g., --version, -v, or check the software's About/Info section) and note the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within any known affected version range for this CVE (no specific range provided in CVE details)
  2. Locate file writing functions or APIs
    Search the application codebase or configuration for functions related to file writing, such as functions that accept file paths, filenames, or file content as parameters. Check logs, documentation, or source code for mentions of file creation, write, or save operations
    Affected if The application contains file writing functionality that lacks input sanitization on file name or path parameters
  3. Inspect input validation on file writing operations
    Review the code or configuration handling file writing to verify whether file names/paths undergo strict validation (allowlist, sanitization of special characters). Check for direct use of user-supplied input in file path construction
    Affected if The file writing mechanism accepts user-controlled input without proper sanitization (no allowlist validation, no escaping of shell metacharacters)
  4. Verify privilege requirements for the file writing function
    Check the application's permission model, role requirements, or API documentation to determine what privilege level is needed to access the file writing function
    Affected if The file writing function is accessible to users with high privileges (administrative, root-level, or equivalent) who can trigger the vulnerable code path
  5. Assess network exposure of the vulnerable function
    Determine if the file writing function is exposed via network APIs, web interfaces, or remote services. Check firewall rules, listener configurations, and access control settings
    Affected if The file writing function is network-accessible without sufficient authentication or network-level restrictions

You are affected if your installed version is within the affected range, the application has a file writing function lacking input sanitization, and that function is accessible to high-privilege users (potentially remotely).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and sanitization on all file writing operations, preferably using allowlist validation for file names and paths. Apply the principle of least privilege to limit what commands the application process can execute.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,880
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28749 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28749 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data