CVE-2024-28765
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM SDI 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.0.14 and IBM Security Directory Integrator 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Security Directory Integrator versions 7.2.0.0-7.2.0.14 and 10.0.0.0-10.0.0.2 return detailed technical error messages directly to the browser, exposing sensitive system information such as stack traces, file paths, database details, or configuration data that could aid attackers in reconnaissance and further exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.0.15>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed IBM Security Directory Integrator versionCheck the product version through the Administration Console, about page, or version file in the installation directory. Common locations include the 'about' section in the web UI or a version.properties file in the installation root.Affected if The installed version falls within 7.2.0.0-7.2.0.14 or 10.0.0.0-10.0.0.2, meaning it is lower than 7.2.0.15 or 10.0.0.3 respectively.
-
Verify the web-based administration interface is accessibleConfirm that the IBM Security Directory Integrator web console or administration portal is running and reachable on its configured port (typically 8080, 8443, or custom).Affected if The web interface is exposed and accessible, which is required for the error message disclosure to occur.
-
Trigger a deliberate error condition to observe responseSubmit an invalid request to the web interface, such as a malformed input, missing required parameters, or access a non-existent resource. Observe the HTTP response body and any error pages returned.Affected if The response contains detailed technical information such as stack traces, file paths, database connection strings, configuration details, or Java exception messages rather than a generic error page.
-
Review web container error handling configurationExamine the web container configuration files (such as web.xml) for error-page mappings. Check if custom error handlers are defined to return generic messages, or if verbose error reporting is enabled.Affected if No custom error pages are configured, or the container is set to display verbose error details (such as stack traces) to client browsers.
You are affected if the installed version is 7.2.0.0-7.2.0.14 or 10.0.0.0-10.0.0.2 AND the web interface returns detailed technical error messages to users instead of generic error pages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.2.0.1510.0.0.3
Configure the application to use custom error pages that return generic error messages without exposing technical details. Review and disable verbose error reporting in the web container configuration.
IBM Security Directory Integrator 7.2.0.15 (for 7.2.x branch) or 10.0.0.3 (for 10.0.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current version of IBM Security Directory Integrator installed in your environment.
- 2. Determine which branch (7.2.x or 10.0.x) is currently in use.
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed release: IBM Security Directory Integrator 7.2.0.15 (for 7.2.x users) or 10.0.0.3 (for 10.0.x users).
- 4. Obtain the download from IBM Fix Central or your authorized IBM support channel.
- 5. Review IBM's release notes and installation instructions for the specific version.
- 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production.
- 7. Apply the upgrade following IBM's standard upgrade procedures for Security Directory Integrator.
- 8. Verify that the fix is applied by confirming the version number and testing that detailed error messages are no longer exposed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28765 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28765 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data