CVE-2024-28826
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper restriction of local upload and download paths in check_sftp in Checkmk before 2.3.0p4, 2.2.0p27, 2.1.0p44, and in Checkmk 2.0.0 (EOL) allows attackers with sufficient permissions to configure the check to read and write local files on the Checkmk site server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a path traversal vulnerability in Checkmk's check_sftp component where improper restriction of local upload and download paths allows authenticated users with sufficient permissions to read and write arbitrary files on the Checkmk server via the SFTP check configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.0= 2.1.0= 2.2.0= 2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Checkmk versionRun 'cmk --version' or check the Checkmk web interface under 'Help > About' to find the exact version numberAffected if The version is 2.0.0 or earlier, or exactly 2.1.0, 2.2.0, or 2.3.0 (not patched to 2.3.0p4, 2.2.0p27, or 2.1.0p44)
-
Verify SFTP check functionality is in useNavigate to the Checkmk web interface > Setup > Services > Monitored endpoints > SFTP checks, or run 'cmk -L' to list available check types and look for 'check_sftp'Affected if SFTP checks are configured and active in the monitoring environment
-
Review SFTP check configurationAccess Setup > Services > Monitored endpoints > SFTP checks and inspect any configured SFTP check definitions for path parametersAffected if Any SFTP check configurations exist that could accept file paths
-
Audit user permissions for SFTP configurationGo to Setup > Users > Roles and Permissions > Permission settings, or check the 'Checkmk: SFTP checks' permission category under the relevant user rolesAffected if Any user role grants permission to configure or edit SFTP checks
-
Examine SFTP connection loggingCheck Checkmk's var/log directory for SFTP-related log files, or view the SFTP check output in the GUI for any unusual path access attemptsAffected if Logs show unexpected file paths being accessed via SFTP functionality
You are affected if your Checkmk version is within the affected range AND the SFTP check feature is enabled with users having SFTP configuration permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Checkmk versions 2.3.0p4, 2.2.0p27, 2.1.0p44 or later. Until patched, restrict administrative permissions for users who can configure SFTP checks.
2.3.0p4 (or later 2.3.x), 2.2.0p27 (or later 2.2.x), or 2.1.0p44 (or later 2.1.x); 2.0.0 is EOL with no patch
- 1. Identify current Checkmk version by running 'cmk --version' or checking the GUI login page
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (2.1.x, 2.2.x, or 2.3.x)
- 3. For Checkmk 2.3.x: Upgrade to version 2.3.0p4 or later
- 4. For Checkmk 2.2.x: Upgrade to version 2.2.0p27 or later
- 5. For Checkmk 2.1.x: Upgrade to version 2.1.0p44 or later
- 6. For Checkmk 2.0.0: This version is End-of-Life (EOL) with no patch available; migrate to a supported version
- 7. After upgrade, verify the check_sftp configuration does not contain malicious path traversal patterns
- 8. Review user permissions for check_sftp rule configuration to ensure only trusted admins can configure it
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28826 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28826 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data