CheckmkApplication

CVE-2024-28833

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts with two factor authentication methods in Checkmk 2.3 before 2.3.0p6 facilitates brute-forcing of second factor mechanisms.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Checkmk versions 2.3 before 2.3.0p6 fail to properly restrict excessive authentication attempts when using two-factor authentication methods. This improper restriction allows attackers to repeatedly attempt to brute-force second-factor codes (such as TOTP, SMS, or email codes) without account lockout or rate limiting, significantly reducing the effort needed to compromise 2FA-protected accounts.

MitigationUpgrade Checkmk to version 2.3.0p6 or later which implements proper rate limiting and restrictions on 2FA authentication attempts. If immediate upgrading is not possible, consider restricting network access to the login interface via firewall rules or VPN as a temporary compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CheckmkApplication
Affected:= 2.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Checkmk version
    Run 'cmk --version' from the command line, or log into the Checkmk web interface and navigate to Setup > About Checkmk to view the version number
    Affected if The version is 2.3.0 through 2.3.0p5 (any version before 2.3.0p6)
  2. Verify if two-factor authentication is enabled
    Log into Checkmk as an administrative user, go to Setup > Users > User Settings, or check the ~/var/check_mk/states directory for 2FA configuration files. Alternatively, examine the etc/check_mk/multisite.d/wato/users.mk configuration file for 2FA-related settings such as '2fa_enabled', 'totp', 'sms', or 'email' authentication methods
    Affected if Any 2FA method (TOTP, SMS, or email verification) is configured for user accounts

You are affected if your Checkmk installation runs version 2.3.0 through 2.3.0p5 AND has two-factor authentication enabled for any user account, because the lack of rate limiting on 2FA attempts can allow brute-force attacks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Checkmk to version 2.3.0p6 or later which implements proper rate limiting and restrictions on 2FA authentication attempts. If immediate upgrading is not possible, consider restricting network access to the login interface via firewall rules or VPN as a temporary compensating control.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2.3.0p6

  1. Verify current Checkmk version using 'cmk --version' or through the web interface
  2. Backup the Checkmk configuration and data directory before upgrading
  3. Download Checkmk version 2.3.0p6 from the official Checkmk download page (checkmk.com)
  4. Stop the Checkmk site using 'cmk -O <sitename>' or the web interface shutdown option
  5. Install the upgrade package using the appropriate method for your installation (deb, rpm, or source)
  6. Start the Checkmk site and verify the upgrade was successful
  7. Log in and verify that 2FA is now properly protected with rate limiting

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Checkmk Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28833 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28833 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data