SuricataApplication · Oisf

CVE-2024-28870

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.0.17 / 7.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine developed by the OISF and the Suricata community. When parsing an overly long SSH banner, Suricata can use excessive CPU resources, as well as cause excessive logging volume in alert records. This issue has been patched in versions 6.0.17 and 7.0.4.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Suricata's SSH banner parsing logic contains a vulnerability where overly long SSH banners trigger excessive CPU consumption and generate excessive logging volume in alert records. This can be exploited to cause denial-of-service conditions through resource exhaustion.

MitigationUpgrade Suricata to version 6.0.17 or 7.0.4 which contain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider implementing network-level filtering or rate limiting for SSH connections with unusually long banners.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SuricataApplication
Affected:< 6.0.17>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Suricata version
    Run 'suricata --version' or check the package manager (dpkg -l suricata, rpm -qi suricata)
    Affected if Version is below 6.0.17, or between 7.0.0 and 7.0.4 (exclusive)
  2. Verify SSH parsing is enabled in Suricata
    Inspect the Suricata configuration file (typically /etc/suricata/suricata.yaml) for 'app-layer' settings and ensure ssh.parser is not disabled, or check if ssh protocol is being parsed in the rules/flow configuration
    Affected if SSH protocol parsing is enabled and the version falls in the affected range
  3. Confirm Suricata is actively processing SSH traffic
    Check if there are active SSH flows or if the SSH banner parser is being invoked - look at Suricata logs or run 'suricata --list-app-layer-protos' to confirm SSH support is compiled in
    Affected if Suricata is actively inspecting SSH traffic and version is affected

You are affected if Suricata is parsing SSH traffic and the installed version is below 6.0.17 or between 7.0.0 and 7.0.4.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.0.17 / 7.0.4 or later
Fixed in 6.0.177.0.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Suricata to version 6.0.17 or 7.0.4 which contain the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider implementing network-level filtering or rate limiting for SSH connections with unusually long banners.

Recommended fix High confidence

Suricata 6.0.17 (for 6.x branch) or 7.0.4 (for 7.x branch)

  1. 1. Identify the currently installed Suricata version using 'suricata --version'
  2. 2. If running Suricata 6.x series (version < 6.0.17), plan upgrade to version 6.0.17
  3. 3. If running Suricata 7.x series (>= 7.0.0 and < 7.0.4), plan upgrade to version 7.0.4
  4. 4. Consult the official Suricata upgrade documentation for your installation method (e.g., package manager, source compilation)
  5. 5. Before upgrading, backup Suricata configuration files (/etc/suricata/ by default)
  6. 6. Upgrade Suricata using your package manager or by compiling from source
  7. 7. Verify the new version is running using 'suricata --version'
  8. 8. Test that SSH traffic is being parsed correctly and that the resource issue is resolved
Caveat Minor point release updates; review release notes for any configuration changes or deprecations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Suricata Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28870 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28870 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data