CVE-2024-28902
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (rascman.exe). The vulnerability allows a local attacker to potentially access sensitive information that should not be otherwise accessible. The CVSS 5.5 score indicates moderate severity with low attack complexity and no privileges required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.20651< 10.0.14393.6981< 10.0.17763.5820< 10.0.19044.4412< 10.0.19045.4412< 10.0.22000.2899< 10.0.22621.3593< 10.0.22631.3593CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine your Windows versionRun 'winver' from the command prompt or check the registry key 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion' for the 'CurrentBuild' and 'DisplayVersion' valuesAffected if The Windows version matches any of the affected builds: Windows 10 1507 (<10.0.10240.20651), 1607 (<10.0.14393.6981), 1809 (<10.0.17763.5820), 21h2 (<10.0.19044.4412), 22h2 (<10.0.19045.4412), or Windows 11 21h2 (<10.0.22000.2899), 22h2 (<10.0.22621.3593), 23h2 (<10.0.22631.3593)
-
Locate the rascman.exe fileVerify that C:\Windows\System32\rascman.exe exists on the system using 'dir C:\Windows\System32\rascman.exe' or 'Get-Item C:\Windows\System32\rascman.exe'Affected if The file exists on the system (the vulnerable component is present)
-
Check rascman.exe file versionRight-click rascman.exe in System32, go to Details tab, or run 'wmic datafile where name="C:\Windows\System32\rascman.exe" get Version,FileSize,LastModified'Affected if The file version is lower than the fixed version for your specific Windows build (compare against the version thresholds listed in the affected products)
-
Verify Remote Access service presenceRun 'sc query RemoteAccess' or check Services.msc for the 'Routing and Remote Access' service statusAffected if The Remote Access service is installed on the system (the vulnerable code path can be triggered)
-
Confirm patch installation statusRun 'wmic qfe list' or check Windows Update history for security updates installed after the CVE-2024-28902 patch date (released June 2024)Affected if No security update for CVE-2024-28902 has been installed, or the installed updates do not include the fix for this vulnerability
You are affected if your Windows version falls within any of the affected build ranges AND the rascman.exe file exists on your system AND the June 2024 security update for CVE-2024-28902 has not been installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2065110.0.14393.698110.0.17763.5820
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2024-28902 through standard Windows Update or manual patch deployment. Verify Remote Access connectivity functionality after patching.
June 2024 Windows Security Update (KB5039212 or subsequent updates) - specific build numbers vary by Windows version as listed in the affected versions
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Alternatively, manually download and install the June 2024 security update (or later) from the Microsoft Update Catalog for your specific Windows version
- Verify the update installed successfully by checking the installed updates in Control Panel > Programs and Features > View installed updates
- Confirm the version matches or exceeds the fixed build for your Windows release (e.g., Windows 10 22h2 should be >= 10.0.19045.4412)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-28902 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-28902 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data