CVE-2024-2906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in SoftLab Radio Player.This issue affects Radio Player: from n/a through 2.0.73.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Missing Authorization vulnerability exists in SoftLab Radio Player versions up to 2.0.73, allowing unauthorized access to certain functionality or data due to improper or missing access control checks. The medium severity (CVSS 6.5) indicates the issue is network-exploitable with moderate impact.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SoftLab Radio Player versionCheck the application version displayed in the software UI, or check any version file (such as version.txt, about.php, or similar) in the installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 2.0.73 or lower
-
Locate sensitive endpoints or functionsReview application source code or API endpoints for functions handling user data, admin operations, configuration changes, or content managementAffected if Sensitive functions or endpoints exist in the application
-
Test unauthorized access to sensitive functionsAttempt to access identified sensitive endpoints or call sensitive functions without providing valid authentication credentials or session tokensAffected if Access is granted without proper authorization credentials
-
Inspect access control implementationReview the application code for access control checks (such as role verification, permission checks, or session validation) on sensitive functionsAffected if No or insufficient access control checks are found before executing sensitive operations
-
Verify authentication is enforced on all sensitive pathsCheck that all endpoints or functions handling sensitive data require valid authentication, either through code review or by observing HTTP response codes when accessing without credentialsAffected if Sensitive endpoints return valid data or successful responses without authentication
You are affected if SoftLab Radio Player version 2.0.73 or lower is installed AND sensitive functionality can be accessed without proper authorization credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all sensitive endpoints and functions, ensuring users can only access resources they are permitted to access. Conduct a thorough access control audit across the application.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data