CVE-2024-29158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHDF5 through 1.14.3 contains a stack buffer overflow in H5FL_arr_malloc, resulting in the corruption of the instruction pointer and causing denial of service or potential code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHDF5 library versions through 1.14.3 contain a stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the H5FL_arr_malloc function. This memory corruption issue allows an attacker to overwrite the instruction pointer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service via application crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.14.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed HDF5 library versionRun 'h5dump --version' or check library files: 'ldconfig -p | grep hdf5' and examine the file version using 'file' or 'strings' on the library. Also check package manager: 'dpkg -l libhdf5*' (Debian) or 'rpm -qa | grep hdf5' (RHEL).Affected if The reported version is 1.14.3 or lower, or version information cannot be determined (indicating an older unpatched build).
-
Locate HDF5 library files on the systemSearch for HDF5 shared libraries: 'find /usr -name "*hdf5*" -type f 2>/dev/null' and note their paths for version inspection.Affected if HDF5 library files exist on the system and their version (if readable from filename or metadata) is 1.14.3 or below.
-
Detect HDF5 usage in running processesCheck for processes using HDF5: 'lsof +D /usr 2>/dev/null | grep -i hdf' or 'ps aux | grep -i hdf'. Also monitor for HDF5 file access via 'inotifywait' on directories containing HDF5 files.Affected if Any process is actively loading or using an HDF5 library at version 1.14.3 or lower, making the vulnerable H5FL_arr_malloc function code path reachable.
-
Inspect HDF5 configuration and build informationIf HDF5 was built from source, check the build configuration file or 'H5public.h' header for the H5_VERSION_NUM macro defining the version. Run 'grep -r "H5_VERSION" /usr/include/hdf5* 2>/dev/null'.Affected if The compiled-in version macro indicates 1.14.3 or lower.
A system is affected if HDF5 library version 1.14.3 or lower is installed and any application or process can trigger HDF5 file operations, enabling the vulnerable H5FL_arr_malloc function to be reached.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade HDF5 to a version beyond 1.14.3 once available, or apply vendor-supplied patches. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict untrusted input from reaching HDF5 file operations and monitor for anomalous behavior.
HDF5 version greater than 1.14.3 (check www.hdfgroup.org for the latest stable release)
- Check the current HDF5 version installed in your environment using your package manager or by running `h5dump --version`
- Upgrade HDF5 to the latest stable version available from the official HDF Group (www.hdfgroup.org) or your distribution's package repository
- After upgrading, verify the new version is running and test that your applications still function correctly with the updated library
- If using a package manager (apt, yum, brew, conda, etc.), run the appropriate update command for your system (e.g., `apt update && apt upgrade libhdf5` or `conda update hdf5`)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data