CVE-2024-29175
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions prior to 7.13.0.0, LTS 7.7.5.40, LTS 7.10.1.30 contain an weak cryptographic algorithm vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to man-in-the-middle attack that exposes sensitive session information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDell PowerProtect Data Domain versions prior to 7.13.0.0 and specified LTS versions contain weak cryptographic algorithms that enable a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform man-in-the-middle attacks, potentially exposing sensitive session information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.7.5.40>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.10.1.30>= 7.11.0.0, < 7.13.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Data Domain OS versionLog into the Data Domain CLI and run the command to display the system version. Typically, this is done using the `version` command or by checking `/etc/dd_version` or similar system information files accessible via admin shell.Affected if The installed version falls into any of these ranges: < 7.7.5.40, >= 7.8.0.0 and < 7.10.1.30, or >= 7.11.0.0 and < 7.13.1.0.
-
Confirm the exact version numberUse the Data Domain management interface or CLI to retrieve the full version string including the build number. Compare this against the specific patch versions mentioned (7.7.5.40, 7.10.1.30, 7.13.1.0).Affected if The exact version is lower than 7.7.5.40, or is between 7.8.0.0 and 7.10.1.30 (exclusive), or between 7.11.0.0 and 7.13.1.0 (exclusive).
-
Determine if remote management interfaces are exposedCheck network configuration to see if Data Domain management interfaces (such as the web UI, SSH, or API endpoints) are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Review firewall rules and access lists.Affected if The management or administrative interfaces are reachable from outside the trusted network, making the weak cryptographic algorithms exploitable by remote attackers.
A user is affected if their Data Domain OS version is below 7.7.5.40, between 7.8.0.0 and 7.10.1.30, or between 7.11.0.0 and 7.13.1.0, and the management interface is network-accessible to untrusted parties.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.7.5.407.10.1.307.13.1.0
Upgrade Dell PowerProtect Data Domain to version 7.13.0.0 or later, or apply the LTS patches (7.7.5.40 or 7.10.1.30) to remediate the weak cryptographic algorithm vulnerability.
7.7.5.40 (for 7.7.x branch), 7.10.1.30 (for 7.8-7.10 branch), or 7.13.1.0 (for 7.11+ branch) - choose the appropriate LTS release based on current branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed Data Domain Operating System version via the management console or CLI: 'system show version'
- 2. Determine which version branch your current installation belongs to (7.7.x, 7.8.x-7.10.x, or 7.11.x-7.13.x)
- 3. For systems on 7.7.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.7.5.40 or later
- 4. For systems on 7.8.x-7.10.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.10.1.30 or later
- 5. For systems on 7.11.x-7.13.x branch: Upgrade to version 7.13.1.0 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version is running: 'system show version'
- 7. Test that critical data protection operations function normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29175 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data