CVE-2024-2961
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe iconv() function in the GNU C Library versions 2.39 and older may overflow the output buffer passed to it by up to 4 bytes when converting strings to the ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, which may be used to crash an application or overwrite a neighbouring variable.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in GNU C Library's iconv() function allows up to 4-byte overflow when converting to ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, potentially enabling application crash or adjacent memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0>= 2.1.93, < 2.40all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed glibc versionRun `ldd --version` or examine the libc shared library with `ls -la /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.*` or check `/usr/lib/libc.so.6`Affected if The reported version is lower than 2.40 and greater than or equal to 2.1.93 (for Linux systems) or the product is Debian 10.0 (which ships with a vulnerable glibc)
-
Locate all glibc library files on the systemUse `find / -name 'libc-*' -o -name 'libc.so*' 2>/dev/null` to find all glibc copies, especially in non-standard pathsAffected if Any glibc library found is version 2.1.93 through 2.39 (exclusive of 2.40)
-
Determine if any applications use the iconv() functionSearch application code or binaries for iconv calls: `grep -r 'iconv' /path/to/applications/` or use `ldd /path/to/binary` to list shared library dependenciesAffected if Applications link against glibc and call iconv() functions
-
Identify if ISO-2022-CN-EXT charset conversion is in useReview application logs, configuration, or source code for usage of 'ISO-2022-CN-EXT' or 'ISO2022CNEXT' as a target charset in iconv_open() callsAffected if Any application performs character set conversion to ISO-2022-CN-EXT using glibc's iconv()
-
Check NetApp product firmware versions (if applicable)For affected NetApp products (H300s, H500s, H700s, H410s, H410c, Active IQ Unified Manager), consult the product's version or firmware information pageAffected if The product is any version of the listed NetApp firmware or software (all versions are affected per the advisory)
The environment is affected if glibc version 2.1.93 through 2.39 is installed AND any application uses the iconv() function to convert to the ISO-2022-CN-EXT character set, or if the system runs a listed NetApp product at any version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.40
Update glibc to version 2.40 or later; identify and test applications using ISO-2022-CN-EXT charset conversion to verify fix effectiveness.
Glibc 2.40 or later
- Check the current glibc version installed (ldd --version or /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6)
- Update the package repository indexes (apt-get update on Debian-based systems)
- Upgrade the glibc package to version 2.40 or later using the appropriate package manager (e.g., apt-get upgrade, yum update, or dnf update)
- Reboot the system to ensure the new glibc library is loaded
- Verify the installed glibc version is 2.40 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-2961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- lists.debian.org
- security.netapp.com
- sourceware.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- www.ambionics.io
- www.ambionics.io
- www.ambionics.io
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-2961 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data