Uncontrolled Search Path (DLL Hijack)Weakness · CWE-427

CVE-2024-29734

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Uncontrolled search path element issue exists in SonicDICOM Media Viewer 2.3.2 and earlier, which may lead to insecurely loading Dynamic Link Libraries. As a result, arbitrary code may be executed with the privileges of the running application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Uncontrolled search path element vulnerability in SonicDICOM Media Viewer 2.3.2 and earlier allows the application to load Dynamic Link Libraries from insecure locations, enabling an attacker to plant malicious DLLs that execute with the privileges of the running application (DLL hijacking).

MitigationUpdate SonicDICOM Media Viewer to a version newer than 2.3.2 that properly secures DLL loading paths, or remove writeable directories from the application's DLL search path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed SonicDICOM Media Viewer version
    Open the application, then navigate to Help > About, or locate the executable (SonicDICOM.exe), right-click and view Properties > Details. Also check for version info in the installation folder or Windows Programs and Features.
    Affected if The displayed version is 2.3.2 or any version number lower than 2.3.2.
  2. Locate the application executable directory
    Find where SonicDICOM Media Viewer is installed (commonly C:\Program Files\SonicDICOM or C:\Program Files (x86)\SonicDICOM). Note the full path to the folder containing SonicDICOM.exe.
    Affected if The application executable resides in a folder where non-admin users have write permissions, or resides in a user-writable folder like Downloads or Desktop.
  3. Inspect DLL search path for writable directories
    Use Process Monitor (from Sysinternals) to trace DLL load events for SonicDICOM.exe, filtering by Path containing the application folder. Alternatively, check folder permissions by right-clicking the application folder, selecting Properties > Security, and reviewing which users have Write or Modify permissions.
    Affected if Writable directories exist within or alongside the application's execution path where an attacker could place a malicious DLL.
  4. Check for unexpected DLLs in application directory
    Manually list all .dll files in the application installation folder and any folder from which the application is launched. Compare against expected DLLs documented by the vendor or observed in a clean install.
    Affected if Unexpected or unsigned DLL files are present in the application directory or working directory, indicating potential DLL planting.

You are affected if SonicDICOM Media Viewer version 2.3.2 or earlier is installed AND the application directory or a directory in its DLL search path is writable by untrusted users, allowing DLL hijacking.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update SonicDICOM Media Viewer to a version newer than 2.3.2 that properly secures DLL loading paths, or remove writeable directories from the application's DLL search path.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29734 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29734 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data