CVE-2024-29880
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11 users with access to the agent machine might obtain permissions of the user running the agent process
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in JetBrains TeamCity versions before 2023.11 where users with access to the agent machine can obtain the permissions of the user running the agent process. This allows an attacker with machine-level access to elevate privileges to the agent's running user context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2023.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TeamCity installationLook for TeamCity installation directories or check for TeamCity services/processes on the system. Common locations include /opt/TeamCity, C:\TeamCity, or directories under Program Files on Windows.Affected if TeamCity is not found on the system - not applicable
-
Confirm this is a TeamCity agentCheck if the installed TeamCity instance is configured as an agent (not the server). Examine the configuration files or process details - agent installations typically have a buildAgent directory and communicate with a TeamCity server.Affected if This is a TeamCity server-only installation - not affected by this agent-specific vulnerability
-
Determine the installed TeamCity versionCheck the version of the TeamCity agent installation. Look for version information in the agent's about screen, version file, or startup logs. Compare the version number against the 2023.11 threshold.Affected if Version is 2023.11 or later - not affected. Version is before 2023.11 - potentially affected
-
Verify the agent process is runningCheck if the TeamCity agent process is currently active on the system using process monitoring tools (such as task manager on Windows or ps/top on Linux). The vulnerability requires the agent to be running for privilege escalation to occur.Affected if Agent process is not running - low immediate risk but still vulnerable when started
-
Assess physical and logical access to the agent machineReview who has access to the machine hosting the TeamCity agent. The vulnerability requires an attacker to have machine-level access to exploit the privilege escalation.Affected if Untrusted or insufficiently restricted personnel have access to the agent machine - higher exposure to this vulnerability
If the system runs a TeamCity agent version earlier than 2023.11, and untrusted users can access that machine, the environment is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2023.11
Upgrade to TeamCity version 2023.11 or later. Additionally, restrict physical and logical access to agent machines to trusted personnel only.
TeamCity 2023.11 or later
- Create a full backup of your TeamCity installation including the <TeamCity home> directory and database
- Stop the TeamCity server and all running agents
- Download TeamCity 2023.11 or a later stable version from the official JetBrains website (www.jetbrains.com)
- Follow the standard TeamCity upgrade instructions for your operating system
- Start the TeamCity server and verify all services are running correctly
- Confirm the upgrade was successful by checking the TeamCity version in the administration UI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29880 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data