CVE-2024-29964
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBrocade SANnav versions before v2.3.0a do not correctly set permissions on files, including docker files. An unprivileged attacker who gains access to the server can read sensitive information from these files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBrocade SANnav versions before v2.3.0a set overly permissive file permissions (likely 644 or world-readable) on sensitive files including docker-related configuration files. An unprivileged local user or attacker who gains any server access can read these files to obtain sensitive information such as credentials, API keys, or configuration secrets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.3.0aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SANnav installation and versionLocate the SANnav installation directory and check the version file or use the SANnav management interface to determine the installed version. Common locations include /opt/sannav or the application root directory.Affected if The installed version is anything before 2.3.0a (e.g., 2.2.0, 2.1.0, etc.)
-
Locate docker configuration filesSearch for docker-related configuration files in the SANnav installation directory, typically under the config or data subdirectories. Look for files such as docker-compose.yml, docker.env, or similar configuration files that may contain credentials or API keys.Affected if Docker configuration files exist in the SANnav installation directory and contain sensitive information such as passwords, API keys, or secrets in plain text
-
Check file permissions on sensitive configuration filesUse 'ls -la' or 'stat' commands to examine the permissions on docker configuration files and other sensitive files (e.g., configuration files, credential files, environment files). Look for permissions like 644 (rw-r--r--) or 666 (rw-rw-rw-) which allow world read access.Affected if Sensitive files have permissions that allow read access by any user on the system (e.g., 644, 655, 666, or other non-600/640 permissions)
-
Verify world-readable statusAs a non-privileged user test if you can read the sensitive configuration files using 'cat <filename>' or 'readlink -f <filename>' without elevated privileges.Affected if A non-privileged user account on the same system can successfully read docker configuration or other sensitive files containing credentials
You are affected if SANnav version is before 2.3.0a AND sensitive configuration files (particularly docker-related) have overly permissive file permissions allowing non-privileged users to read them.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.3.0a
Upgrade to Brocade SANnav v2.3.0a or later which corrects file permissions. If immediate upgrade is not possible, audit and restrict permissions on docker files and other sensitive configuration files to owner-only (600 or 640).
2.3.0a
- Backup the current SANnav installation and configuration
- Download SANnav version 2.3.0a or later from support.broadcom.com
- Stop the current SANnav services
- Install SANnav version 2.3.0a using the standard upgrade procedure
- Start the SANnav services
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the SANnav version
- Confirm that file permissions on sensitive files are now correctly restricted
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-29964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-29964 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data