CVE-2024-30029
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA remote code execution vulnerability exists in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS). An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted network packets to a vulnerable RRAS server to execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.20651< 10.0.14393.6981< 10.0.17763.5820< 10.0.19044.4412< 10.0.19045.4412< 10.0.22000.2960< 10.0.22621.3593< 10.0.22631.3593CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS is installed or enabledOpen Server Manager > Add Roles and Features, or check Services console (services.msc) for 'Routing and Remote Access' service. On client Windows, check: Control Panel > Network and Internet > Network and Sharing Center > Change adapter settings > right-click network connection > Properties > check for 'Routing and Remote Access' component.Affected if RRAS component is present on the system (vulnerability only applies if RRAS is installed/enabled)
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' from Run dialog, or execute 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt, or run 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsVersion,OsVersion' in PowerShell.Affected if Windows version is less than any of these thresholds: 10.0.10240.20651 (1507), 10.0.14393.6981 (1607), 10.0.17763.5820 (1809), 10.0.19044.4412 (21h2), 10.0.19045.4412 (22h2), 10.0.22000.2960 (Win11 21h2), 10.0.22621.3593 (Win11 22h2), 10.0.22631.3593 (Win11 23h2)
-
Confirm RRAS service statusOpen Services console (services.msc), locate 'Routing and Remote Access' service, and check its Status column. Alternatively, run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShell.Affected if RRAS service is running (the vulnerability is exploitable only when the service is active)
-
Determine if security update is appliedRun 'Get-HotFix -Description 'Security Update'' | Where-Object {$_.InstalledOn -gt (Get-Date).AddDays(-60)} in PowerShell, or check Windows Update history for recent RRAS-related security patches.Affected if No security update for CVE-2024-30029 is installed (version remains below patched build numbers)
System is affected if RRAS is installed/enabled AND the Windows build number is below the fixed version for that Windows release line, and the security update is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2065110.0.14393.698110.0.17763.5820
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2024-30029. If immediate patching is not possible, consider disabling RRAS if not required, or restricting network access to RRAS servers via firewalls or network segmentation.
Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.20651 | Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.6981 | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.5820 | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.4412 | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.4412 | Windows 11 21h2: 10.0.22000.2960 | Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.3593 | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.3593
- Check current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the security update
- Alternatively, manually download the specific security update from the Microsoft Catalog (KB) for your Windows version
- Restart the computer after the update is installed
- Verify the update was successful by checking Windows Update history for the corresponding security patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30029 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30029 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data