CVE-2024-30209
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA00) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-0DA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA10) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA20) (All versions < V3.0.1.1), SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager (6GT2780-1EA30) (All versions < V3.0.1.1). Affected systems transmit client-side resources without proper cryptographic protection. This could allow an attacker to eavesdrop on and modify resources in transit. A successful exploit requires an attacker to be in the network path between the RTLS Locating Manager server and a client (MitM).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager transmits client-side resources (likely JavaScript, CSS, or other web assets) without proper cryptographic protection (likely missing or misconfigured TLS/SSL). An attacker positioned in the network path between server and client can perform a MitM attack to eavesdrop on or modify these resources in transit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager versionOpen the application or check Windows Programs and Features for 'SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager' and note the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is older than V3.0.1.1 (for example V3.0, V2.x, or any version prior to V3.0.1.1)
-
Determine if web interface uses unencrypted HTTPAttempt to access the Locating Manager web interface using http:// (not https://) - for example http://localhost or the configured server IP addressAffected if The web interface is accessible via plain HTTP without redirect to HTTPS
-
Verify TLS/SSL encryption is enabled on the web serviceCheck the Locating Manager configuration files or web server settings for SSL/TLS protocol settings and certificate configurationAffected if TLS/SSL is not configured, disabled, or set to accept weak/legacy protocols only
-
Confirm client-side resources are served over unencrypted connectionsUse a browser or network capture tool to inspect HTTP traffic when loading the Locating Manager web client - check if resources load over http:// instead of https://Affected if JavaScript, CSS, or other web assets are fetched over plain HTTP rather than HTTPS
A user is affected if the installed SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager version is older than V3.0.1.1 AND the web interface or its resources are served over unencrypted HTTP connections, allowing potential MitM tampering.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager to version V3.0.1.1 or later to implement proper encryption for client-side resource transmission.
V3.0.1.1
- Identify all deployed instances of SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager across all model numbers (6GT2780-0DA00, 6GT2780-0DA10, 6GT2780-0DA20, 6GT2780-0DA30, 6GT2780-1EA10, 6GT2780-1EA20, 6GT2780-1EA30)
- Verify current installed version of each instance
- Download SIMATIC RTLS Locating Manager V3.0.1.1 from Siemens CertPortal or official Siemens support channels
- Schedule maintenance window for each affected system
- Back up current configuration and data
- Upgrade each RTLS Locating Manager instance to version V3.0.1.1
- Verify successful installation and configuration persistence
- Test that all client connections now use encrypted channels
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30209 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data