CVE-2024-30263
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmacro-pdfviewer is a PDF Viewer Macro for XWiki using Mozilla pdf.js. Users with edit rights can access restricted PDF attachments using the PDF Viewer macro, just by passing the attachment URL as the value of the ``file`` parameter. Users with view rights can access restricted PDF attachments if they are shown on public pages where the PDF Viewer macro is called using the attachment URL instead of its reference. This vulnerability has been patched in version 2.5.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe PDF Viewer macro in XWiki allows unauthorized access to restricted PDF attachments. Users with edit rights can bypass access controls by passing the attachment URL directly to the `file` parameter. Additionally, view-only users can access restricted PDFs when the macro is called with an attachment URL on public pages. This is an authorization bypass via improper reference validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm XWiki installationIdentify if XWiki is running in your environment. Check for XWiki web application files, services, or the presence of the XWiki database.Affected if XWiki is not installed - the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Check macro-pdfviewer component versionLocate and inspect the macro-pdfviewer component version in your XWiki installation. Compare the installed version against the fixed version 2.5.1. If using a package manager or XWiki extension manager, query the installed version of the PDF Viewer macro.Affected if The installed version is lower than 2.5.1, indicating the unpatched component is in use.
-
Identify PDF Viewer macro usageSearch your XWiki instance for pages or content that utilize the PDF Viewer macro. Look for wiki syntax or API calls containing 'pdfviewer' or the macro invocation. Check both page content and templates.Affected if The PDF Viewer macro is actively used on your XWiki instance.
-
Review macro configuration for file parameterInspect pages using the PDF Viewer macro for the 'file' parameter pointing to attachment URLs. Examine whether restricted PDF attachments are being referenced via direct URL parameters rather than through proper attachment selectors. Check macro configurations and page content for patterns like 'file=...'.Affected if The macro is configured with the 'file' parameter pointing directly to attachment URLs, enabling the authorization bypass path.
You are affected if your XWiki installation has the macro-pdfviewer component version below 2.5.1 AND the PDF Viewer macro is in use with the 'file' parameter exposing attachment URLs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the macro-pdfviewer component to version 2.5.1 or later to apply the vendor patch. Review existing pages using the PDF Viewer macro to ensure restricted attachments are not exposed.
Upgrade to macro-pdfviewer version 2.5.1 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed version of macro-pdfviewer in the XWiki instance
- 2. Upgrade macro-pdfviewer to version 2.5.1 or later using the XWiki extension manager or the appropriate package manager
- 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- 4. Test that access controls on PDF attachments are properly enforced after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30263 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data