Advanced Ip ScannerApplication · Radmin

CVE-2024-30376

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Famatech Advanced IP Scanner Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Famatech Advanced IP Scanner. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the application's use of Qt. The application loads Qt plugins from an unsecured location. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code in the context of an administrator. Was ZDI-CAN-20768.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a DLL/plugin hijacking vulnerability in Famatech Advanced IP Scanner. The Qt-based application loads Qt plugins from an unsecured location (likely the application directory or a world-writable path), allowing a local attacker with low-privileged code execution to place a malicious DLL that gets loaded with administrator privileges during the application's elevated execution.

MitigationApply vendor patch when available. In the interim, ensure the application directory is not writable by non-admin users and implement application control policies to prevent unauthorized DLL loading.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Advanced Ip ScannerApplication
Affected:= 2.5.4594.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed version of Advanced IP Scanner
    Open the application, go to Help > About, or check the executable file properties (right-click the executable > Properties > Details) to find the version number
    Affected if Version is exactly 2.5.4594.1
  2. Check application directory permissions
    Right-click the application installation folder (typically C:\Program Files\Famatech\Advanced IP Scanner), select Properties > Security, and review which users have Write or Modify permissions
    Affected if Non-admin users or the 'Users' group have Write or Modify permissions to the application directory
  3. Inspect application directory for unexpected DLLs
    Open the application folder and list all .dll files; check for any Qt-related DLLs (e.g., qwindows.dll, qoffscreen.dll, qminimal.dll) that were not installed by the vendor or appear suspicious
    Affected if Unexpected or newly created Qt DLL files exist in the application directory that were not part of the original installation
  4. Verify Qt plugin subdirectory security
    Check the application's plugins subdirectory (if present) for write permissions and look for any unauthorized DLLs placed there
    Affected if The plugins folder contains DLLs not part of the original installation or is writable by low-privileged users

A user is affected if they have version 2.5.4594.1 installed AND the application directory or its subdirectories are writable by non-admin users, allowing placement of malicious DLLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch when available. In the interim, ensure the application directory is not writable by non-admin users and implement application control policies to prevent unauthorized DLL loading.

Fix this in Advanced Ip Scanner Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30376 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30376 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data