JunosOperating system · Juniper

CVE-2024-30384

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 20.4 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX4300 Series allows a locally authenticated attacker with low privileges to cause a Denial-of-Service (Dos). If a specific CLI command is issued, a PFE crash will occur. This will cause traffic forwarding to be interrupted until the system self-recovers.  This issue affects Junos OS:  All versions before 20.4R3-S10, 21.2 versions before 21.2R3-S7, 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A locally authenticated low-privilege attacker can trigger a Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) crash on Juniper EX4300 switches by issuing a specific CLI command, causing denial of service. The vulnerability stems from an improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in the PFE.

MitigationUpgrade Junos OS to fixed versions (20.4R3-S10, 21.2R3-S7, or 21.4R3-S6). Restrict CLI access to trusted low-privilege users and monitor for the specific trigger command.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JunosOperating system
Affected:< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2= 21.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Junos OS version
    Run 'show version' command in CLI or check /var/etc/host VERSION file
    Affected if Version is < 20.4, = 20.4, = 21.2, or = 21.4
  2. Confirm EX4300 hardware model
    Run 'show chassis hardware' or check 'show version' output for model information
    Affected if Device model is EX4300 switch and version matches vulnerable ranges from step 1
  3. Check for recent PFE crashes
    Review system logs using 'show log messages' and filter for PFE-related entries, or run 'show pfe statistics error'
    Affected if PFE crash events occurred and device is on a vulnerable version

Device is affected if it is an EX4300 switch running Junos OS versions 20.4, 21.2, 21.4, or any version below 20.4, and an attacker with low-privilege CLI access can trigger the vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 20.4 or later
Fixed in 20.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Junos OS to fixed versions (20.4R3-S10, 21.2R3-S7, or 21.4R3-S6). Restrict CLI access to trusted low-privilege users and monitor for the specific trigger command.

Recommended fix High confidence

20.4R3-S10, 21.2R3-S7, or 21.4R3-S6 (depending on which release branch you are on)

  1. 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the EX4300 device using: show version
  2. 2. Based on current version, plan upgrade to the appropriate fixed release: 20.4R3-S10 or later, 21.2R3-S7 or later, or 21.4R3-S6 or later
  3. 3. Review Juniper release notes for the target version for any special upgrade instructions
  4. 4. Download the appropriate Junos OS upgrade package from Juniper Networks support portal
  5. 5. Upload the upgrade package to the device using: file copy or USB
  6. 6. Initiate the upgrade using: request system software add <package> reboot
  7. 7. After reboot, verify the new version using: show version and confirm the PFE is operational
Caveat Standard Junos upgrade precautions apply - verify hardware compatibility, backup configuration, and plan maintenance window as upgrade requires reboot

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Junos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30384 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data