CVE-2024-30405
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS SRX 5000 Series devices using SPC2 line cards while ALGs are enabled allows an attacker sending specific crafted packets to cause a transit traffic Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of these specific packets will sustain the Denial of Service condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS SRX 5000 Series with SPC2 with ALGs enabled. * All versions earlier than 21.2R3-S7; * 21.4 versions earlier than 21.4R3-S6; * 22.1 versions earlier than 22.1R3-S5; * 22.2 versions earlier than 22.2R3-S3; * 22.3 versions earlier than 22.3R3-S2; * 22.4 versions earlier than 22.4R3; * 23.2 versions earlier than 23.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn incorrect buffer size calculation in the ALG (Application Layer Gateway) processing path on Juniper SRX 5000 Series devices with SPC2 line cards allows remote attackers sending specially crafted packets to cause a denial of service by disrupting transit traffic processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.1= 22.2= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an SRX 5000 Series modelAffected if Device is NOT an SRX 5000 Series device (the vulnerability only affects this series)
-
Verify SPC2 line card presenceRun 'show chassis hardware detail' or 'show chassis fpc' to check for SPC2 line cards in the deviceAffected if Device does NOT have SPC2 line cards (the flaw requires SPC2 line cards)
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show system information' to obtain the installed Junos versionAffected if Version matches: < 21.2, = 21.2, = 21.4, = 22.1, = 22.2, = 22.3, = 22.4, or = 23.2 (any of these vulnerable versions)
-
Verify ALG modules are enabledRun 'show security alg' to list enabled Application Layer Gateway modulesAffected if ANY ALG is enabled (the buffer size calculation flaw occurs in the ALG processing path, so enabled ALGs create the attack surface)
User is affected if the device is an SRX 5000 Series with SPC2 line cards, runs a vulnerable Junos version listed above, and has at least one ALG module enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the appropriate Junos OS version update per the version matrix (21.2R3-S7 and later, 21.4R3-S6 and later, 22.1R3-S5 and later, 22.2R3-S3 and later, 22.3R3-S2 and later, 22.4R3 and later, or 23.2R2 and later). As a compensating control, disable unused ALGs if the upgrade cannot be performed immediately.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S7 or later (21.4R3-S6, 22.1R3-S5, 22.2R3-S3, 22.3R3-S2, 22.4R3, or 23.2R2 depending on your release train)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the SRX 5000 Series device with SPC2 line cards using 'show version'
- 2. Confirm ALGs are enabled by checking the configuration with 'show configuration security alg'
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version from Juniper Networks support portal based on the current version branch
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or FTP/SCP
- 5. Install the upgrade using 'request system software add <package-name> reboot'
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version' and confirm ALG functionality with 'show security alg status'
- 7. Test transit traffic flows to verify DoS condition is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30405 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30405 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data