CVE-2024-30419
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting vulnerability exists in a-blog cms Ver.3.1.x series versions prior to Ver.3.1.12, Ver.3.0.x series versions prior to Ver.3.0.32, Ver.2.11.x series versions prior to Ver.2.11.61, Ver.2.10.x series versions prior to Ver.2.10.53, and Ver.2.9 and earlier versions. If this vulnerability is exploited, a user with a contributor or higher privilege who can log in to the product may execute an arbitrary script on the web browser of the user who accessed the website using the product.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in a-blog CMS allows authenticated users with contributor-level or higher privileges to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the browsers of other users accessing the website. The vulnerability affects multiple version branches (3.1.x, 3.0.x, 2.11.x, 2.10.x, and 2.9 and earlier) prior to their respective patched releases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.53>= 2.11.0, < 2.11.61>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.32>= 3.1.0, < 3.1.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed a-blog CMS versionLocate the version information in your a-blog CMS installation, typically found in the admin dashboard under System Settings > Version Info, or by checking a version file in the installation directory if one existsAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: < 2.10.53; >= 2.11.0 and < 2.11.61; >= 3.0.0 and < 3.0.32; or >= 3.1.0 and < 3.1.12
-
Verify user role configurationAccess the user management or role management section of the admin panel and review the defined user roles and their permission levelsAffected if The system has user roles with contributor-level or higher privileges enabled, which is the default configuration for this CMS
-
Check for existing contributor-level accountsReview the list of registered users in the admin panel under User Management to identify accounts assigned contributor, editor, or administrator rolesAffected if Any user accounts with contributor-level or higher privileges exist in the system
-
Inspect input handling for user-generated contentExamine the CMS configuration files and template settings related to blog post creation, comment submission, or other user input features to confirm they are enabledAffected if Features that allow contributor-level users to create or edit content are active (these are standard CMS features and typically enabled by default)
You are affected if your a-blog CMS version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have users with contributor-level or higher privileges enabled, as the XSS payload would be injected through content creation features accessible to those users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.532.11.613.0.32
Update a-blog CMS to the fixed versions (3.1.12, 3.0.32, 2.11.61, or 2.10.53) as appropriate for your branch. Additionally, audit privileged user accounts and implement output encoding as a defense-in-depth measure.
Upgrade to Ver.3.1.12, Ver.3.0.32, Ver.2.11.61, or Ver.2.10.53 (or later versions if available)
- 1. Create a full backup of the current a-blog cms installation including database and files
- 2. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official a-blog cms website (developer.a-blogcms.jp) or update source
- 3. If using the built-in update function, navigate to the admin panel and run the update check to apply the patch
- 4. If manual update: upload the new version files, overwriting existing files while preserving config files and custom themes
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the version number in the admin panel
- 6. Test that the application functions correctly, particularly areas where contributor-level users input content
- 7. Clear any application caches if the CMS uses caching
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30419 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30419 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data