CVE-2024-30511
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Frédéric GILLES FG PrestaShop to WooCommerce.This issue affects FG PrestaShop to WooCommerce: from n/a through 4.45.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA log file information disclosure vulnerability in the FG PrestaShop to WooCommerce migration plugin allows sensitive data (likely credentials, API keys, or migration tokens used during the PrestaShop-to-WooCommerce data transfer process) to be written to log files, potentially exposing this information to unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if FG PrestaShop to WooCommerce plugin is installedCheck your WordPress/WooCommerce site's plugin directory for 'fg-prestashop-to-woocommerce' or similar migration plugin files. Look in wp-content/plugins/ for directories containing 'fg' or 'prestashop' in the name.Affected if The plugin is present on the system
-
Locate plugin log filesSearch for log files created by the migration plugin. Common locations include: the plugin's own directory, wp-content/uploads/fg/, wp-content/debug.log, or a logs/ subdirectory within the plugin folder. Check plugin settings for custom log paths.Affected if Log files exist and are found on the system
-
Inspect log files for sensitive dataOpen any log files and search for strings that resemble credentials: look for 'password', 'api_key', 'token', 'secret', 'key=', 'Bearer ', 'Basic ', or base64-encoded strings that may represent tokens or keys.Affected if Log files contain any cleartext credentials, API keys, tokens, or sensitive migration parameters
-
Verify log file accessibilityCheck if log files are stored in web-accessible directories (public_html, www, or any directory served by the web server). Attempt to access log files via HTTP/HTTPS from an external request to confirm they are publicly readable.Affected if Log files are stored in web-accessible paths and can be retrieved via HTTP request
-
Check for recent migration activityReview the plugin's activity logs or migration history to identify recent PrestaShop-to-WooCommerce transfer operations, which would have generated logs containing sensitive transfer parameters.Affected if Migration operations were performed using this plugin, creating logs during the transfer process
A user is affected if the FG PrestaShop to WooCommerce plugin is installed, has been used for migrations, and produces log files containing exposed credentials or tokens that are accessible to unauthorized parties.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict file system access to log directories, ensure logs are not web-accessible, and update to a patched version once available; review existing logs for exposed credentials and rotate any compromised secrets.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-30511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-30511 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data