User Spam RemoverWordPress extension · Joelhardi

CVE-2024-31298

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Joel Hardi User Spam Remover.This issue affects User Spam Remover: from n/a through 1.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The User Spam Remover plugin versions up to 1.0 contains a vulnerability where sensitive information is being written to log files. This allows unauthorized access to potentially sensitive data (such as user credentials, tokens, or PII) through exposed log files.

MitigationIdentify and remediate the code paths that write sensitive data to logs by removing, redacting, or filtering sensitive parameters before logging. Ensure log files are stored outside web root with restricted permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
User Spam RemoverWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify plugin installation and version
    Locate the Joelhardi User Spam Remover plugin in your WordPress installation (typically in /wp-content/plugins/ directory) and check the main plugin file for the declared version number
    Affected if The installed version is below 1.1
  2. Locate plugin log files
    Search the plugin directory and adjacent directories (including wp-content/uploads/, wp-content/debug.log, and any custom log directories configured in plugin settings) for log files created by the User Spam Remover plugin
    Affected if Log files exist and are stored within the web-accessible directory structure
  3. Check log file accessibility
    Verify file permissions on discovered log files - attempt to access them via HTTP request from an unauthenticated browser context to confirm they are web-exposed
    Affected if Log files are directly accessible via web browser without authentication
  4. Inspect logs for sensitive data
    Open log files and search for patterns indicating sensitive information: plain-text passwords, API tokens, email addresses, or userSubmitted content that may contain PII
    Affected if Log files contain credentials, tokens, email addresses, or other personally identifiable information
  5. Confirm logging is active
    Review plugin configuration settings or code to determine if the logging functionality is enabled and actively writing data
    Affected if Logging is enabled and the plugin processes user data that could be captured in logs

You are affected if the Joelhardi User Spam Remover plugin version is below 1.1 and log files containing sensitive user data are accessible via the web or to unauthorized users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.1 or later
Fixed in 1.1
Interim mitigation

Identify and remediate the code paths that write sensitive data to logs by removing, redacting, or filtering sensitive parameters before logging. Ensure log files are stored outside web root with restricted permissions.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

1.1

  1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. Locate the User Spam Remover plugin
  4. Click 'Update now' if an update is available, or manually upload version 1.1 of the plugin

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in User Spam Remover Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31298 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31298 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data