CVE-2024-31309
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHTTP/2 CONTINUATION DoS attack can cause Apache Traffic Server to consume more resources on the server. Version from 8.0.0 through 8.1.9, from 9.0.0 through 9.2.3 are affected. Users can set a new setting (proxy.config.http2.max_continuation_frames_per_minute) to limit the number of CONTINUATION frames per minute. ATS does have a fixed amount of memory a request can use and ATS adheres to these limits in previous releases. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 8.1.10 or 9.2.4 which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Traffic Server versions 8.0.0-8.1.9 and 9.0.0-9.2.3 are vulnerable to an HTTP/2 CONTINUATION frame DoS attack that can cause excessive resource consumption. The vulnerability stems from the lack of rate limiting on CONTINUATION frames, allowing an attacker to overwhelm server resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.1.10>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.4= 10.0= 38= 39= 40CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Traffic Server versionRun 'traffic_server -v' or check the package version using your system package manager (e.g., 'dpkg -l | grep traffic-server' on Debian, 'rpm -qi trafficserver' on Fedora/RHEL)Affected if The installed version is 8.0.0 through 8.1.9, or 9.0.0 through 9.2.3
-
Verify HTTP/2 protocol support is enabledCheck the records.config or equivalent configuration file for 'proxy.config.http2.enabled' or inspect the running configuration using 'traffic_ctl config get proxy.config.http2.enabled'Affected if HTTP/2 is enabled (value set to 1 or true) - the vulnerability only applies when HTTP/2 traffic is accepted
-
Check CONTINUATION frame rate limit settingQuery the configuration using 'traffic_ctl config get proxy.config.http2.max_continuation_frames_per_minute' or inspect records.config for this settingAffected if The setting is not defined, commented out, or set to 0 (unlimited) - meaning the server has no protection against CONTINUATION frame flooding
The environment is affected if the installed Apache Traffic Server version falls within 8.0.0-8.1.9 or 9.0.0-9.2.3, HTTP/2 is enabled, and no rate limit is configured for CONTINUATION frames per minute.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.109.2.4
Upgrade to version 8.1.10 or 9.2.4, or configure proxy.config.http2.max_continuation_frames_per_minute to limit CONTINUATION frames per minute.
Upgrade to Apache Traffic Server 8.1.10 (for 8.x branch) or 9.2.4 (for 9.x branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Apache Traffic Server version using: traffic_server --version or atsversion
- 2. If running version 8.0.0 through 8.1.9, plan upgrade to version 8.1.10
- 3. If running version 9.0.0 through 9.2.3, plan upgrade to version 9.2.4
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed release from https://archive.apache.org/dist/trafficserver/
- 5. Back up the current Traffic Server configuration and data directories
- 6. Stop the Traffic Server service: traffic_ctl server stop
- 7. Install the new version using the package manager or compile from source
- 8. Start the Traffic Server service: traffic_ctl server start
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31309 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data