CVE-2024-31334
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn DevmemIntFreeDefBackingPage of devicemem_server.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA logic error in the DevmemIntFreeDefBackingPage function in devicemem_server.c allows arbitrary kernel code execution, enabling local privilege escalation without requiring additional privileges or user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check kernel version on the Android deviceRun 'uname -a' or read '/proc/version' to obtain the running kernel version stringAffected if The kernel version is an unpatched version of the Android kernel that contains the vulnerable devicemem_server.c logic error (Android versions prior to vendor patch availability)
-
Verify if the devicemem kernel module or functionality is presentCheck for the presence of '/dev/ion' or similar devicemem-related device nodes and kernel symbols; also check '/sys/module' for devicemem or ion-related modulesAffected if The devicemem functionality is enabled in the kernel, as the vulnerability exists in DevmemIntFreeDefBackingPage function in devicemem_server.c
-
Check kernel configuration for devicemem supportIf you have access to the kernel config (often in /boot/config-* or /proc/config.gz), search for CONFIG_DEVICEMEM or similar devicemem/ion configuration optionsAffected if The kernel has CONFIG_DEVICEMEM or related memory management features enabled, which exposes the vulnerable code path
If the Android device runs a kernel version that predates the vendor security patch for CVE-2024-31334 AND has devicemem functionality present, the device is affected by this privilege escalation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied kernel patch addressing the logic error in devicemem_server.c; this typically involves updating the Linux kernel to a patched version.
Apply Android security patch level that includes the fix for CVE-2024-31334 (check Android Security Bulletin for specific date)
- 1. Check the Android Security Bulletin for the month this CVE was addressed (refer to source.android.com/security-bulletin)
- 2. Identify the Android security patch level that includes the fix for this vulnerability
- 3. Apply the monthly security update to your Android device via system updates
- 4. Verify the device has the correct security patch level installed in Settings > About Phone > Android version (should show the patched security level)
- 5. For developers building custom kernels: apply the kernel source patch to devicemem_server.c in the Android kernel source tree, specifically fixing the logic error in DevmemIntFreeDefBackingPage function
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31334 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31334 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data