CVE-2024-31414
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Eaton Foreseer software provides users the capability to customize the dashboard in WebView pages. However, the input fields for this feature in the Eaton Foreseer software lacked proper input sanitization on the server-side, which could lead to injection and execution of malicious scripts when abused by bad actors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Eaton Foreseer software where the dashboard customization feature for WebView pages lacks proper server-side input sanitization. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript or HTML into input fields, which then executes when other users view the customized dashboards.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.8.600CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Eaton ForeseerLocate the software version information for Eaton Foreseer Electrical Power Monitoring System. This is typically found in the application itself under Help > About, or in the installer/upgrade documentation.Affected if The installed version is lower than 7.8.600 (e.g., 7.8.500, 7.7.x, etc.)
-
Confirm WebView dashboard feature is in useDetermine whether the WebView-based dashboard customization feature is accessible or enabled in the installation. This feature allows users to customize dashboard views with user-supplied input.Affected if The WebView dashboard customization feature is available and users have the ability to add or modify dashboard elements with custom text or labels
-
Inspect dashboard configuration data for unsanitized inputExamine the stored dashboard configurations or user-created dashboards for any HTML, JavaScript, or script-related keywords (such as <script>, javascript:, onerror=, onload=) in text fields that should only contain plain text.Affected if User-supplied text fields in dashboard configurations contain raw HTML or JavaScript code that is not encoded or escaped
-
Review application logs for XSS attempt patternsCheck application and web server logs for patterns indicative of XSS probing or injection attempts targeting the dashboard customization endpoints, such as requests containing script tags or event handlers.Affected if Logs show attempts to inject script content into dashboard input fields, or if stored XSS payloads are present in the application database
You are affected if your Eaton Foreseer installation is version 7.8.600 or higher, the WebView dashboard customization feature is not in use, and no suspicious script content is found stored in dashboard configurations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.8.600
Implement server-side input validation using allowlist validation combined with context-aware output encoding for all user-supplied data in the dashboard customization feature to prevent script injection.
Eaton Foreseer Electrical Power Monitoring System version 7.8.600 or later
- 1. Identify the current version of Eaton Foreseer Electrical Power Monitoring System installed in your environment
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade process
- 3. Back up the current system configuration and any custom dashboard settings
- 4. Obtain the Eaton Foreseer version 7.8.600 or later from official Eaton sources (www.eaton.com)
- 5. Follow Eaton's standard upgrade procedure for Foreseer software
- 6. After upgrade, verify the system is operational and all services are running
- 7. Validate that the WebView dashboard customization feature now properly sanitizes input on the server-side
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31414 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31414 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data