CVE-2024-31425
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMS Amelia.This issue affects Amelia: from n/a through 1.0.95.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Amelia TMS allows attackers to induce authenticated users to unknowingly perform unwanted actions by tricking their browsers into sending malicious requests. The medium severity (5.4) indicates that while the exploit requires user interaction (such as clicking a link), it can lead to unauthorized state-changing operations within the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Amelia TMS is installedLook for Amelia TMS in your application directory or check installed packages/plugins. Common locations include wp-content/plugins/amelia or similar plugin directories if it's a WordPress plugin, or the application's vendor/modules directory.Affected if Amelia TMS is present in the environment
-
Determine the installed version of Amelia TMSCheck the version file or header in the Amelia TMS installation - typically found in a version.php, plugin header, or package.json file within the Amelia directory.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.95 or lower
-
Inspect state-changing endpoints for anti-CSRF token implementationExamine the source code of Amelia TMS, focusing on forms and API endpoints that perform state-changing operations (such as user management, bookings, settings changes). Look for the presence of anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer tokens) in the request handling code.Affected if State-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation in the code
-
Check if Origin or Referer header validation existsReview the request validation logic in Amelia TMS to determine if incoming requests are validated for Origin or Referer headers to prevent cross-origin requests.Affected if No Origin or Referer header validation is implemented for state-changing requests
-
Verify if the application is accessible to authenticated users via browserConfirm that Amelia TMS is exposed via a web interface where authenticated users can interact with it, as CSRF requires a user session to exploit.Affected if The TMS interface is accessible to authenticated users in a browser
You are affected if Amelia TMS version 1.0.95 or lower is installed AND state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Amelia to the latest version beyond 1.0.95 once available, or implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations and verify Origin/Referer headers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31425 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31425 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data