Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2024-31502

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Insurance Management System v.1.0.0 and before allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via a crafted POST request to /admin/core/new_staff.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Insurance Management System version 1.0.0 and prior contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in the staff creation endpoint at /admin/core/new_staff. A remote attacker can send a crafted POST request to create administrative accounts or elevate their privileges without proper authorization checks, effectively gaining unauthorized access to administrative functions.

MitigationImplement proper role-based access control (RBAC) and authorization validation on the /admin/core/new_staff endpoint to ensure only authenticated administrators with appropriate permissions can create new staff accounts. Add server-side validation of user roles before processing staff creation requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Insurance Management System version
    Locate the application installation and check the version file or metadata. Common locations include: version info in the application header, a VERSION file in the installation directory, or the version displayed in the application's about/admin panel. Compare your installed version to the affected range: 1.0.0 and prior.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0 or any version prior to 1.0.0.
  2. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Confirm the application has the /admin/core/new_staff endpoint available by checking the application's URL routing configuration, web server logs, or by attempting to access the endpoint via HTTP request (if authorized). Inspect the application's routing or URL mapping files for this path.
    Affected if The /admin/core/new_staff endpoint is present and accessible in the application.
  3. Check for missing or weak authorization on staff creation
    Review the server-side code handling the /admin/core/new_staff endpoint. Look for role validation logic, permission checks, or session verification before allowing staff account creation. Search for authorization decorators, role checks, or access control middleware on this endpoint.
    Affected if No role-based access control (RBAC) or authorization validation exists in the code handling this endpoint, or the checks can be bypassed.
  4. Inspect for unauthorized admin accounts
    Query the system's user or staff account database/table to enumerate all accounts with administrative privileges. Compare against expected legitimate admin accounts documented in your system records.
    Affected if Unexpected or undocumented administrative accounts exist in the system.

You are affected if you run Insurance Management System version 1.0.0 or prior, the /admin/core/new_staff endpoint exists in your deployment, and no proper authorization controls are enforced on that endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper role-based access control (RBAC) and authorization validation on the /admin/core/new_staff endpoint to ensure only authenticated administrators with appropriate permissions can create new staff accounts. Add server-side validation of user roles before processing staff creation requests.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31502 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31502 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data