CVE-2024-31682
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect access control in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of Phone Cleaner: Boost & Clean v2.2.0 allows attackers to bypass fingerprint authentication due to the use of a deprecated API.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Phone Cleaner: Boost & Clean v2.2.0 Android application uses a deprecated fingerprint authentication API that fails to properly enforce biometric access controls, allowing attackers to bypass the fingerprint check entirely and gain unauthorized access to the application's cleaning and optimization features.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm app installationGo to Settings > Apps and search for 'Phone Cleaner: Boost & Clean' or check your app drawer for the app iconAffected if The app is present on the device
-
Check installed versionIn Settings > Apps > Phone Cleaner: Boost & Clean, view the Version or App info field. Compare against v2.2.0Affected if Version shown is exactly 2.2.0
-
Verify biometric authentication is enabledOpen the app, go to Settings or Security settings within the app, and check if Fingerprint or Biometric authentication is turned on for app accessAffected if Fingerprint/biometric lock is enabled in the app settings
-
Check for deprecated FingerprintManager APIDecompile the APK (using apktool or similar) and inspect the smali or Java code for imports or usage of 'android.hardware.fingerprint.FingerprintManager' instead of 'androidx.biometric.BiometricPrompt'Affected if Code contains references to the deprecated FingerprintManager API
If the Phone Cleaner: Boost & Clean app version is 2.2.0 and has fingerprint authentication enabled, the device is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace the deprecated biometric authentication API with the current AndroidX Biometric API (androidx.biometric.BiometricPrompt) which properly validates biometric credentials and enforces authentication challenges.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31682 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31682 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data