CVE-2024-31695
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA misconfiguration in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of Binance: BTC, Crypto and NFTS v2.85.4, allows attackers to bypass authentication when adding a new fingerprint.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA misconfiguration in the fingerprint authentication mechanism of the Binance mobile app v2.85.4 allows attackers to bypass authentication during the new fingerprint enrollment process, enabling unauthorized access to the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed Binance app versionOn Android: Go to Settings > Apps > Binance > App info > Version. On iOS: Go to Settings > Binance > Version. Compare the version number to v2.85.4.Affected if The installed version is v2.85.4 exactly.
-
Verify if biometric authentication is enabledOpen the Binance app, go to Settings > Security > Biometric Authentication (or Fingerprint/Face ID). Check if any biometric option is toggled on or configured.Affected if Biometric authentication is enabled on the vulnerable version.
-
Check for recent fingerprint enrollment activityReview the app's security logs or authentication history if available. Look for any fingerprint enrollment events, especially if multiple fingerprints were added unexpectedly.Affected if New fingerprint enrollment occurred without the user's explicit action.
-
Verify account access without authenticationAttempt to access the Binance app after closing it completely. If the app allows access without prompting for authentication when fingerprint is set up, this may indicate the bypass.Affected if The app grants access without requiring fingerprint authentication after a fresh launch.
You are affected if the Binance mobile app version is v2.85.4 and fingerprint/biometric authentication is enabled or was recently enrolled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the patched version of Binance: BTC, Crypto and NFTS as soon as available; review and properly configure biometric authentication flows to ensure proper validation during fingerprint enrollment.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31695 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data