Ex200 FirmwareOperating system · Totolink

CVE-2024-31806

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
70/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
TOTOLINK EX200 V4.0.3c.7646_B20201211 was discovered to contain a Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability in the RebootSystem function which can reboot the system without authorization.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The TOTOLINK EX200 V4.0.3c.7646_B20201211 router contains an unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in its RebootSystem function. An attacker can trigger a system reboot without any authorization by calling this function, causing service disruption.

MitigationImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on the RebootSystem function to ensure only authenticated administrators can trigger reboots. Until a patched firmware is available, restrict network access to the device's management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ex200 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 4.0.3c.7646_b20201211

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the device firmware version
    Access the router's web management interface and navigate to System Status or Firmware Upgrade page to view the current firmware version. Alternatively, check via CLI if SSH/Telnet is available using 'cat /proc/version' or '固件版本' command.
    Affected if The firmware version is 4.0.3c.7646_b20201211 exactly
  2. Confirm management interface accessibility
    Determine if the router's HTTP/HTTPS management interface (typically on ports 80/443 or 8080) is reachable from untrusted networks. Use 'netstat -an' or nmap scanning from an external host to identify exposed management ports.
    Affected if The management interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted LAN segments without firewall protection
  3. Verify authentication is required for reboot function
    Attempt to access the RebootSystem function endpoint without providing credentials. This may be at a URL like /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi with reboot-related parameters, or examine the device's CGI/JSON API endpoints to identify unauthenticated reboot triggers.
    Affected if The reboot function can be triggered via HTTP/HTTPS request without any authentication token or session cookie
  4. Check for unauthorized access to cstecgi.cgi endpoint
    Inspect the router's web server configuration and examine the cstecgi.cgi binary or its handling code to verify if the reboot operation validates user sessions before executing.
    Affected if The reboot operation lacks session validation or accepts requests without valid authentication credentials

The device is affected if it runs firmware version 4.0.3c.7646_b20201211 and its management interface or reboot API endpoint is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authentication and authorization checks on the RebootSystem function to ensure only authenticated administrators can trigger reboots. Until a patched firmware is available, restrict network access to the device's management interface.

Fix this in Ex200 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $3,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-31806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-31806 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data