Sinema Remote Connect ClientApplication · Siemens

CVE-2024-32006

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-09-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 SP2). The affected application does not expire the user session on reboot without logout. This could allow an attacker to bypass Multi-Factor Authentication.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SINEMA Remote Connect Client fails to invalidate user sessions when the system reboots without an explicit logout. This session persistence allows an attacker with local access to use the existing authenticated session without re-authentication, effectively bypassing the MFA protection that should be enforced on new session establishment.

MitigationUpgrade to SINEMA Remote Connect Client V3.2 SP2 or later, which properly invalidates user sessions on system reboot.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sinema Remote Connect ClientApplication
Affected:< 3.2= 3.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify SINEMA Remote Connect Client is installed
    Check Windows installed programs list or review registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Siemens\SINEMA Remote Connect for installation evidence
    Affected if The product is installed and present on the system
  2. Identify installed version number
    Locate the SINEMA Remote Connect Client executable or DLL file (typically in Program Files\Siemens\SINEMA Remote Connect\) and view its version properties, or query the registry key where the installed version is stored
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is not visible
  3. Compare version to affected range
    Match the identified version against the vulnerable range: versions less than 3.2, or exactly version 3.2
    Affected if Installed version is < 3.2 or equals 3.2 exactly
  4. Confirm session usage since last reboot
    Check if any user authenticated to the SINEMA Remote Connect Client prior to the most recent system reboot without performing an explicit logout
    Affected if Authenticated session existed before a reboot without logout

A system is affected if SINEMA Remote Connect Client version 3.2 or any version below 3.2 is installed and a user session was active prior to a system reboot without explicit logout, allowing potential session reuse.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2 or later
Fixed in 3.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to SINEMA Remote Connect Client V3.2 SP2 or later, which properly invalidates user sessions on system reboot.

Recommended fix High confidence

V3.2 SP2

  1. 1. Check the current installed version of SINEMA Remote Connect Client (Help > About)
  2. 2. Download SINEMA Remote Connect Client V3.2 SP2 or later from the Siemens industrial security website or cert-portal.siemens.com
  3. 3. Close any running instances of SINEMA Remote Connect Client
  4. 4. Run the installer for the updated version
  5. 5. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
  6. 6. After installation, verify the version shows V3.2 SP2 or higher in Help > About
  7. 7. Reboot the system to confirm sessions are properly expired after restart

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Sinema Remote Connect Client Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32006 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data