ImagesharpApplication · Sixlabors

CVE-2024-32036

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.8 / 3.1.4 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ImageSharp is a 2D graphics API. A data leakage flaw was found in ImageSharp's JPEG and TGA decoders. This vulnerability is triggered when an attacker passes a specially crafted JPEG or TGA image file to a software using ImageSharp, potentially disclosing sensitive information from other parts of the software in the resulting image buffer. The problem has been patched in v3.1.4 and v2.1.8.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ImagesharpApplication
Affected:< 2.1.8>= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.8 / 3.1.4 or later
Fixed in 2.1.83.1.4
Vendor patch github.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

ImageSharp 2.1.8 (for 2.x branch) or ImageSharp 3.1.4 (for 3.x branch)

  1. Identify the current ImageSharp version in use by checking the project dependencies (e.g., in .csproj, packages.config, or .nuspec file)
  2. If using ImageSharp 2.x (version < 2.1.8): Update the ImageSharp package reference to version 2.1.8 or later
  3. If using ImageSharp 3.x (version >= 3.0.0 and < 3.1.4): Update the ImageSharp package reference to version 3.1.4 or later
  4. Restore the updated NuGet packages (e.g., using dotnet restore or rebuilding the solution)
  5. Verify the updated version by checking the resolved package version in the project's dependency tree
  6. Test the application to ensure image processing functionality still works correctly after the upgrade
Caveat Both 2.1.8 and 3.1.4 are patch releases with minimal risk; however, always review release notes for any minor breaking changes before upgrading

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,600. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32036 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data