CVE-2024-32093
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nose Graze Novelist.This issue affects Novelist: from n/a through 1.2.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Novelist WordPress plugin (versions through 1.2.2) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions via maliciously crafted requests, leveraging the lack of proper nonce token validation on state-changing operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Novelist plugin is installed and activeIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Novelist' in the list. Verify the status shows 'Active'. Alternatively, check the file /wp-content/plugins/ exists.Affected if Novelist plugin is not installed or is not active, then the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Determine installed Novelist plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, click on 'Novelist' to view the plugin details, and note the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the 'Version' header in /wp-content/plugins/novelist/readme.txt or the plugin main PHP file.Affected if Version is 1.2.2 or earlier, indicating the plugin is within the affected version range.
-
Locate state-changing operations in the pluginExamine the plugin files in /wp-content/plugins/novelist/ for forms (HTML forms with action attributes) and AJAX handlers (wp_ajax_ hooks). Focus on files handling settings changes, user submissions, or data modifications.Affected if State-changing operations exist in the plugin, creating potential CSRF attack surface.
-
Inspect nonce validation in state-changing codeOpen the PHP files containing state-changing operations. Search for wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce, check_admin_referer, or nonce validation functions. Verify each form and AJAX endpoint has corresponding nonce verification before processing.Affected if State-changing operations lack proper nonce validation (no wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer calls), confirming the vulnerability is present.
You are affected if Novelist plugin version 1.2.2 or earlier is active AND contains state-changing operations (forms or AJAX endpoints) that lack WordPress nonce validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonces (wp_nonce_field, wp_verify_nonce) on all forms and AJAX endpoints to verify request origin and intent, then test that legitimate operations still function correctly.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32093 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32093 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data