CVE-2024-32368
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsecure Permission vulnerability in Agasta Sanketlife 2.0 Pocket 12-Lead ECG Monitor FW Version 3.0 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) component.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceThe Agasta Sanketlife 2.0 Pocket 12-Lead ECG Monitor running firmware version 3.0 contains an insecure permission vulnerability in its Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) component. A local attacker within BLE range can exploit this permission misconfiguration to trigger a denial of service condition, rendering the ECG monitor non-functional.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ECG monitor modelLocate the device label or packaging to confirm it is an Agasta Sanketlife 2.0 Pocket 12-Lead ECG MonitorAffected if The device model matches Sanketlife 2.0 Pocket 12-Lead ECG Monitor
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device settings or use the companion mobile application to view the firmware version informationAffected if The firmware version is 3.0
-
Determine if BLE is enabledCheck the device Bluetooth settings or observe if the device is broadcasting BLE signals (visible in BLE scanner apps on nearby devices)Affected if BLE is currently enabled and the device is discoverable
-
Verify BLE exposureUse a BLE scanning tool to confirm the device is within detectable BLE range from unauthorized devicesAffected if The device BLE service is accessible without authentication from a distance within BLE range
-
Check BLE connection accessibilityAttempt to connect to the device via BLE using standard tools (such as gatttool or BLE scanner apps) to see if connection is allowed without credentialsAffected if BLE connection can be established without any authentication or pairing requirement
A user is affected if they are using an Agasta Sanketlife 2.0 Pocket 12-Lead ECG Monitor with firmware version 3.0 and have BLE enabled, as the insecure permission vulnerability allows unauthenticated local attackers within BLE range to cause denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataThe vendor should release a firmware update that implements proper authentication and authorization controls on the BLE interface. Users should apply vendor-provided firmware updates and limit BLE exposure by disabling the feature when not in use in secure clinical environments.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32368 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32368 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data