Wp Client ReportsWordPress extension · Switchwp

CVE-2024-32439

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.0.23 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SwitchWP WP Client Reports.This issue affects WP Client Reports: from n/a through 1.0.22.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WP Client Reports WordPress plugin enables attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended state-changing actions (such as modifying plugin settings or executing administrative functions) by luring them to visit malicious sites while logged in.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations including admin forms and AJAX endpoints, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and consider adding SameSite attribute to session cookies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wp Client ReportsWordPress extension
Affected:< 1.0.23

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WP Client Reports plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins, or check wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'wp-client-reports' or similar
    Affected if The plugin is present in the installation
  2. Identify the installed plugin version
    Access the plugin file (usually main PHP file in the plugin folder) and locate the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block, or view version in WordPress plugin admin list
    Affected if Version number is lower than 1.0.23 (e.g., 1.0.22, 1.0.20, etc.)
  3. Confirm the plugin handles state-changing operations
    Review the plugin code for admin forms (POST requests) and AJAX endpoints that modify data (settings, reports, user data)
    Affected if The plugin contains admin forms or AJAX handlers that perform actions like saving settings, generating reports, or modifying client data
  4. Inspect for missing CSRF protection tokens
    Search plugin PHP files for nonce verification functions: wp_verify_nonce, check_admin_referer, check_ajax_referer. Look for these on form submissions and AJAX actions
    Affected if State-changing forms and AJAX endpoints lack nonce verification or have no 'nonce' field in their forms

You are affected if the plugin version is below 1.0.23 AND the plugin processes administrative actions without verifying CSRF tokens on forms or AJAX requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.0.23 or later
Fixed in 1.0.23
Interim mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (nonces) on all state-changing operations including admin forms and AJAX endpoints, validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and consider adding SameSite attribute to session cookies.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.0.23

  1. Back up your WordPress site database and files before performing any updates
  2. Update the WP Client Reports plugin to version 1.0.23 or later through the WordPress admin dashboard (Plugins > All Plugins > WP Client Reports > Update Now)
  3. Alternatively, update via wp-cli: wp plugin update wp-client-reports --version=1.0.23
  4. After updating, verify the plugin version shows 1.0.23 or higher in the installed plugins list
  5. Test that the plugin functionality works correctly after the update

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Wp Client Reports Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32439 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32439 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data