Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2024-32507

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-05-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Hamid Alinia Login with phone number login-with-phone-number.This issue affects Login with phone number: from n/a through <= 1.7.16.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in the 'Login with phone number' WordPress plugin by Hamid Alinia. The flaw allows authenticated users to escalate their privileges beyond what should be granted, likely through improper validation during the phone number-based authentication process.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to the latest version if a patch is available, otherwise disable the plugin and seek an alternative authentication solution until a fix is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the vulnerable plugin is installed
    Go to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'Login with phone number' by Hamid Alinia. Alternatively, check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'login-with-phone-number' or similar.
    Affected if The plugin 'Login with phone number' by developer Hamid Alinia appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Determine the installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin > Plugins, click on the plugin details to view the installed version number. Compare this to the version that contains the fix.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version (if a patched version is known)
  3. Verify if phone number login is enabled
    Check the plugin settings under Settings > Login with Phone (or similar) to confirm if phone number-based authentication is active on the site.
    Affected if Phone number authentication is enabled and the plugin is installed
  4. Check for unexpected privilege escalation
    Review user role assignments and capabilities in Users > All Users. Look for users who may have acquired higher privileges than intended, particularly users authenticating via phone number.
    Affected if Users have gained privileges beyond what was assigned to their role

A user is affected if the 'Login with phone number' plugin by Hamid Alinia is installed and phone number authentication is enabled, allowing authenticated users to escalate privileges improperly.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the plugin to the latest version if a patch is available, otherwise disable the plugin and seek an alternative authentication solution until a fix is released.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest version of Login with phone number plugin (version 1.7.17 or higher)

  1. 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. 3. Locate the 'Login with phone number' plugin by Hamid Alinia
  4. 4. Check if an update is available (current affected version is <= 1.7.16)
  5. 5. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
  6. 6. If no update appears in WordPress, manually download the latest version from the official WordPress plugin repository and reinstall
  7. 7. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly and test the login functionality

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-32507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-32507 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data